ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2841

Changes in Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Newly Initiated on Biologic and Non-Biologic Therapy Enrolled in a North American Clinical Registry

Philip J. Mease1, Tamara Lesperance2, Neil Accortt2, David Collier2, Mei Liu3, Marc Mason4 and Sabrina Deveikis4, 1Clinical Professor, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 2Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 3352 Turnpike Rd, Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, 4Corrona, LLC., Southborough, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologics, drug treatment, psoriatic arthritis and therapy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Over the past decade, the treatment of
PsA has improved significantly. The purpose of this study was to describe
real-world treatment patterns among PsA patients following initiation of TNF
inhibitor (TNFi) and non-biologic (MTX) therapy over time to understand if
increasing clinical evidence for the benefit of TNFi therapy has led to changes
in treatment patterns.

Methods: Using data on PsA patients from Corrona,
a national multicenter registry of RA and PsA patients, PsA patients were
identified between 1/1/2004 and 12/31/2012 and stratified into 3 cohorts; those
who had initiated TNFi monotherapy (mono), MTX monotherapy or combination (combo)
therapy (TNFi and MTX). Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up data after
first therapy initiation were included. The 3 patient cohorts were further stratified
over three different time periods (2004-2006, 2007-2009, and 2010-2012) based
on year of initiation. Baseline demographic and
clinical characteristics were assessed at drug initiation. The key outcome
measures of interest were persistence on index medication therapy; gaps in
therapy and therapy restarts; therapy changes, including treatment switches and
add-on therapy; and length of time on therapy. Persistence was defined as
continuous use of therapy over a 12-month period.

Results: There were 520 PsA patients who met
inclusion criteria. The 3 groups differed demographically in terms of baseline characteristics.
The proportion of patients initiating TNFi mono has decreased over time, while
the proportion starting combination therapy has remained steady (Table). Over
the three time periods, patients were noted to start TNFi earlier in their
disease course; however, time to initiating TNFi mono was longer than time to
initiating combo therapy. Mean CDAI at initiation was highest among the combo group
and has remained above 12 for all therapy groups in all time periods. Time on initial
therapy decreased as the time period cohorts became more contemporary, but
persistence on TNFi mono was higher than the other two cohorts across all time
periods (in 2010-2012 persistence was 53% on TNFi mono, 34% on MTX mono, and
36% on combo therapy). Patients appear less likely to remove MTX from their combo
therapy in recent years (70% in 2004-2006, 34% in 2010-2012), yet no patients
dropped TNFi from their combo therapy. In the most recent time period, 11% of
mono TNFi users became combo users, whereas 28% of mono MTX users became combo users.

Conclusion: Treatment patterns in PsA patients have
changed from 2004-2012, including earlier TNFi initiation and more cycling.
This may be due to the increasing number of treatment options available and
increased focus on achievement of low disease activity state. However, physicians
do not appear to be more likely to initiate patients on TNFi monotherapy even
though the clinical evidence supporting their effectiveness has increased over
this same time period and patients remain more persistent with it.


Disclosure: P. J. Mease, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Abbvie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, 2,Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Abbvie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, Vertex;, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, 8; T. Lesperance, Amgen, 3; N. Accortt, Amgen, 1,Amgen, 1; D. Collier, Amgen, Inc., 3,Amgen, Inc., 1; M. Liu, Corrona, LLC, 3; M. Mason, Corrona, LLC, 3; S. Deveikis, Corrona, LLC, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease PJ, Lesperance T, Accortt N, Collier D, Liu M, Mason M, Deveikis S. Changes in Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Newly Initiated on Biologic and Non-Biologic Therapy Enrolled in a North American Clinical Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-treatment-patterns-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-newly-initiated-on-biologic-and-non-biologic-therapy-enrolled-in-a-north-american-clinical-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/changes-in-treatment-patterns-in-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-newly-initiated-on-biologic-and-non-biologic-therapy-enrolled-in-a-north-american-clinical-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology