ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • 2026 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 043

Challenges of Cognitive Screening and Formal Neuropsychological Evaluation in Youth with Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Survey of CARRA Providers

Ryan Kammeyer1, Martha Rodriguez2, Andrea Knight3, Rebecca Sadun4, Jeffrey Bennett5, Robert Fuhlbrigge6, Christa Hutaff-Lee5 and Ekemini Ogbu7, 1Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 2Riley Hospital For Children At Indiana University, Carmel, IN, 3Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 5University of Colorado School of Medicine, 6University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 7Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: 2026 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Thursday, March 19, 2026

Title: Posters: Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects I

Session Time: 6:00PM-7:00PM

Background/Purpose: Cognitive dysfunction (CD) occurs in 30-60% of youth with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), and negatively impacts medical care, socioeconomic achievement, and quality of life. However, CD remains under-recognized in clinical practice. Understanding current approaches to screening for CD and formal neuropsychological evaluation in this population and the challenges or barriers to assessment will inform actionable targeted interventions to improve recognition and outcomes.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study assessing current clinical practice and barriers to screening and evaluation of CD. Our electronic survey was distributed to rheumatologists and trainees of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) who cared for individuals with cSLE under 21 years old.

Results: Of 443 eligible CARRA members, 109 (25%) completed the survey. Only 61% routinely asked about or screened for cognitive concerns during clinic visits, and only 27% used a standardized method for screening at any frequency. Challenges in performing cognitive screening included uncertainty with administration, interpreting results, billing, and time available to complete. Formal neuropsychological evaluation was rare (8%) and primarily obtained for patients with an already known history of a neuropsychiatric lupus syndrome. More than half of respondents (54%) rarely or never had neuropsychological evaluations performed for their patients. The most common challenges to neuropsychological evaluation included difficulty accessing these services and assessment duration. Only 28% of providers felt able to adequately address cognition concerns in their patients. Despite this, the large majority thought that cognitive dysfunction was common in cSLE (94%), had long-term impacts on a patient’s health (100%), and that the medical literature supported routine screening of cognition (93%).

Conclusion: Currently, standardized screening methods and neuropsychological evaluation are infrequently used for evaluation of CD in cSLE. While rheumatologists understand that cognitive screening and neuropsychological evaluation are important components of care for youth with cSLE, they face multiple barriers related to guidance on optimal screening frequency/approaches, limited training, time and access to appropriate services. Future work addressing these challenges will support these providers and improve care for patients with cSLE.

Participant and clinical practice characteristics (N&#3f120)Supporting image 1

Current clinical practice and barriers to cognitive screening (N&#3f112)Supporting image 2

Current clinical practice and challenges to utilizing standardized formal neuropsychological evaluations (N = 109)Supporting image 3


Disclosures: R. Kammeyer: Amgen, 6, Novartis, 6; M. Rodriguez: None; A. Knight: None; R. Sadun: None; J. Bennett: Alexion, 1, 5, 6, Amgen, 1, 2, 6, Beigene, 2, Chugai, 6, CorEvitas, 1, F. Hoffman-La Roche, 12, DSMB, Genentech, 1, 5, Immpact Bio, 1, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 6, Novartis, 6; R. Fuhlbrigge: None; C. Hutaff-Lee: None; E. Ogbu: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kammeyer R, Rodriguez M, Knight A, Sadun R, Bennett J, Fuhlbrigge R, Hutaff-Lee C, Ogbu E. Challenges of Cognitive Screening and Formal Neuropsychological Evaluation in Youth with Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Survey of CARRA Providers [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026; 78 (suppl 3). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/challenges-of-cognitive-screening-and-formal-neuropsychological-evaluation-in-youth-with-childhood-onset-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-survey-of-carra-providers/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2026 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/challenges-of-cognitive-screening-and-formal-neuropsychological-evaluation-in-youth-with-childhood-onset-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-survey-of-carra-providers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to PRYSM are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 6:00 PM CT on March 18. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology