ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 673

Cell Bound Complement Activation Products Distinguish Systemic Lupus Erythematosus from Other Diseases Among Patients with High Antinuclear Antibody Titers and Normal Complement

Daniel J. Wallace1, Elena Massarotti2, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman3, Christopher E. Collins4, Anca Askanase5, Jill P. Buyon6, Richard Furie7, Sonali Narain7, Amit Saxena8, Kenneth C. Kalunian9, Cristina Arriens10, Chaim Putterman11, John Conklin12, Roberta Alexander12, Claudia Ibarra12, Tyler O'Malley13, Tarun Chandra14, Joseph Ahearn15, Susan Manzi16, Arthur Weinstein17 and Thierry Dervieux12, 1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3FSM, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 4Rheumatology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 5Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 6Rheumatology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 7Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 8NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 9Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 10Arthritis & Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 11Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA, Bronx, NY, 12Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA, 13Research and Development, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA, 14EmpiriQA LLC, Long Grove, IL, 15Lupus Center of Excellence, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, 16Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 17Rheumatology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: ANA, complement and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Biomarkers and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients are often referred to the rheumatologist because of elevated anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titers. We sought to evaluate the association of cell bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs), low complement (C3 or C4), and anti-double stranded (ds) DNA with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and ANA titers.
Methods: The cohort (n=1155 adults) consisted of 498 patients with SLE with established disease (all fulfilling the 1997 ACR criteria, 91% females, mean age 41 years) pooled from prior studies of complement activation products, and a control group of 657 subjects (86% females; mean age 56 years; 314 with rheumatoid arthritis and 343 with other diseases). Abnormal CB-CAPs consisted of C4d bound to erythrocyte or B-lymphocyte levels above the 99th percentile of normal healthy. Low complement (C3 or C4) and anti-dsDNA (all confirmed using Crithidia luciliae) were determined using immunoassays. ANA titers were determined by indirect immunofluorescence, with subjects classified as having negative (<1:80), intermediate (1:80 to 1:320) or high (≥1:640) ANA status. The sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s index (J), a measure of diagnostic effectiveness that combines sensitivity and specificity (J = sensitivity + specificity – 1) of various markers in distinguishing SLE from non-SLE, were evaluated. J differences were tested using t-tests.
Results: The diagnostic effectiveness of abnormal CB-CAPs, low complement, and anti-dsDNA in distinguishing SLE from non-SLE is presented in the Table. Overall, abnormal CB-CAPs had a significantly greater association with SLE (J=0.51) than low complement (J=0.32) and anti-dsDNA (J=0.31) (p<0.01; n=1155). The greater association of abnormal CB-CAPs in comparison to low complement and anti-dsDNA was statistically significant in the group of subjects with high ANA (p<0.03), intermediate ANA (p<0.01), and negative ANA (p<0.02). This association was also seen among subjects with high ANA (J=0.60) compared to intermediate (J=0.45) and negative ANA (J=0.17) (p<0.01). Similar results were observed for low complement and anti-dsDNA (p<0.01). In the group of subjects with normal complement (309 SLE and 619 non SLE), abnormal CB-CAPs was 50% sensitive and 89% specific while anti-dsDNA was 20% sensitive and 99% specific (J=0.39 vs 0.19; p<0.01). In the subset of subjects with high ANA and normal complement (117 SLE and 106 non SLE), abnormal CB-CAPs was 68% sensitive and 82% specific and yielded higher diagnostic value than anti-dsDNA (40% sensitive and 93% specific) (J=0.50 vs 0.34; p<0.01).
Conclusion: Abnormal CB-CAPs has higher diagnostic performances for SLE than low complement and anti-dsDNA and is a sensitive and specific measure for SLE in patients with high ANA titers and normal complement levels.


Disclosure: D. J. Wallace, Exagen, 2,Exagen, 5; E. Massarotti, Exagen, 2; R. Ramsey-Goldman, Exagen, 2; C. E. Collins, Exagen, 2,Exagen, 8; A. Askanase, Exagen, 2; J. P. Buyon, Exagen, 2; R. Furie, Exagen, 2; S. Narain, Exagen, 2; A. Saxena, Exagen, 2; K. C. Kalunian, Exagen, 2; C. Arriens, Exagen, 2; C. Putterman, Exagen, 2; J. Conklin, Exagen, 3; R. Alexander, Exagen, 3; C. Ibarra, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., 3; T. O'Malley, Exagen Diagnostics, 3; T. Chandra, Exagen, 5; J. Ahearn, Exagen, 2,Exagen, 5,Exagen, 7; S. Manzi, Exagen, 2,Exagen, 7,Exagen, 5; A. Weinstein, Exagen, 2,Exagen, 5,Exagen, 9; T. Dervieux, Exagen, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wallace DJ, Massarotti E, Ramsey-Goldman R, Collins CE, Askanase A, Buyon JP, Furie R, Narain S, Saxena A, Kalunian KC, Arriens C, Putterman C, Conklin J, Alexander R, Ibarra C, O'Malley T, Chandra T, Ahearn J, Manzi S, Weinstein A, Dervieux T. Cell Bound Complement Activation Products Distinguish Systemic Lupus Erythematosus from Other Diseases Among Patients with High Antinuclear Antibody Titers and Normal Complement [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cell-bound-complement-activation-products-distinguish-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-from-other-diseases-among-patients-with-high-antinuclear-antibody-titers-and-normal-complement/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cell-bound-complement-activation-products-distinguish-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-from-other-diseases-among-patients-with-high-antinuclear-antibody-titers-and-normal-complement/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology