ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 603

Cell Bound Complement Activation Products Are Associated with Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Kenneth C. Kalunian1, W. Winn Chatham2, Elena M. Massarotti3, Joyce Reyes-Thomas4, Richard Furie5, Jill P. Buyon6, Emily C. Somers7, Chaim Putterman8, Rachel L. Gross9, Kyriakos A. Kirou10, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman11, Christine Hsieh12, Thierry Dervieux13 and A. Weinstein14, 1UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Rheum/Forchheimer Rm 701, Albert Einstein College of Med, Bronx, NY, 5North Shore-LIJ Health System, Lake Success, NY, 6Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 7IntMed, Environmental Health, and OB/GYN, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 8Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 9Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 11Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 12Rheumatology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 13Research and Development, Exagen Diagnostics, Albuquerque, NM, 14Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Laboratory tests and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Elevated cell-bound complement activation products (CBCAPs) and decreased erythrocyte complement receptor 1 (ECR1) expression may correlate with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We evaluated the relationship between CBCAPs, ECR1 and SLE disease activity as part the multicenter study of complement activation products in the assessment of lupus (CAPITAL).

Methods: The CAPITAL study was cross-sectional and enrolled SLE patients who met the ACR classification criteria. ECR1 as well as complement C4d levels on erythrocytes (EC4d), platelets (PC4d), and B cells (BC4d) were determined using flow cytometry. Disease activity was measured at the time of the study visit using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Disease activity was dichotomously stratified by SELENA-SLEDAI scores <6 (low disease activity) or ≥6 (high disease activity). Statistical analyses utilized Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Fisher Exact tests and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Among 209 SLE evaluable patients (90% females, mean age 41years), a total of 41 (19.6%) had high disease activity at the time of sample acquisition. As presented in Table I, high disease activity was associated with elevated levels of EC4d, BC4d, PC4d and reduced levels of ECR1 (p<0.004).  ROC analyses indicated that EC4d above 14.8 units (ROC AUC=0.646) was associated with a 3.4-fold (95% CI: 1.6-7.4) higher likelihood of high disease activity. Similarly, BC4d above 71.5 units (ROC AUC=0.643) and PC4d above 6.3 units (ROC AUC=0.718) were associated with a 4.3-fold (95% CI:1.9-10.8) and 5.3-fold (95% CI:2.3-13.5) greater likelihood of high disease activity, respectively. Conversely, ECR1 levels below 10 net MFI (AUC=0.694) were associated with a 4.2-fold (95% CI:1.9-9.3) higher likelihood of high disease activity. By multivariate logistic regression analysis only elevated PC4d and low ECR1 were associated with high disease activity. Among patients presenting with both elevated PC4d (>6.3 net MFI) and reduced ECR1 (<10.2 net MFI), 45% had high disease activity compared to 5% of those having PC4d and ECR1 below 6.3 and above 10.2 net MFI respectively (p<0.01). 

Table: CB-CAPS and ECR1 levels in SLE patients with low or high disease activity (MFI: mean fluorescence intensity)

 

 

Low disease activity

N=168

High disease activity

N=41

P value

EC4d  Net MFI

      Net MFI>14.8

11.4 (7.4-19.5)

33.9%

16.6 (11.3-26.0)

63.4%

<0.004

<0.001

BC4d  Net MFI

      Net MFI>71.5

66.7 (35.1-130.0)

45.2%

117.0 (75.2-188.6)

78.0%

<0.005

<0.001

PC4d  Net MFI

      Net MFI >6.3

5.2 (2.4-10.8)

39.9%

13.9 (7.3-43.4)

78.0%

<0.001

<0.001

ECR1  Net MFI

      Net MFI>10.2

13.5 (9.2-17.9)

67.9%

9.3 (6.7-12.4)

34.1%

<0.001

<0.001

Conclusion: These hypothesis generating data suggest that elevated EC4d, BC4d, PC4d and reduced ECR1 levels are associated with high disease activity. Prospective longitudinal studies will be essential to establish the predictive value of CBCAPs and ECR1 measurements for determining SLE disease flares.


Disclosure:

K. C. Kalunian,
None;

W. W. Chatham,
None;

E. M. Massarotti,
None;

J. Reyes-Thomas,
None;

R. Furie,

Exagen,

5;

J. P. Buyon,

Exagen,

5;

E. C. Somers,
None;

C. Putterman,
None;

R. L. Gross,
None;

K. A. Kirou,
None;

R. Ramsey-Goldman,
None;

C. Hsieh,
None;

T. Dervieux,

Exagen,

3;

A. Weinstein,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cell-bound-complement-activation-products-are-associated-with-disease-activity-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology