ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1403

CDAI Analysis of Dose Escalation in a Trial of Infliximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis

John Tesser1, Shawn Black 2, Rongshuang Lin 3, Wayne Langholff 3, Jonathan Uy 4 and Shelly Kafka 4, 1Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associate, Phoenix, AZ, 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, RI, 3Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: infliximab and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster II: Established Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: In the START (Safety Trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis with Remicade Therapy) trial, patients (pts) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received placebo (PBO), or infliximab (IFX) 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, with a primary endpoint of safety at week 22. Pts receiving IFX 3 mg/kg had dose escalation if they met prespecified criteria for lack of response at week 22, which was assessed by combined swollen and tender joint count, S/TJC, (primary nonresponders). They also received dose escalation if they experienced a flare after week 22 (secondary nonresponders, not analyzed here) (1,2). In a post hoc analysis, we examine the effects of IFX dose escalation in the primary nonresponders, using the more relevant tool Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), which includes the 28 S/TJC as well as pt and physician global assessments.

Methods: Adult START pts (N=1082) with 6 swollen and 6 tender joints, despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX), were randomized: PBO (n=363), IFX 3 mg/kg (n=360), or IFX 10 mg/kg (n=361) at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14. At week 22, PBO pts switched to IFX 3 mg/kg for the remainder of the study, and pts randomized to IFX 3 mg/kg continued dosing every 8 weeks or received dose escalation (in increments of 1.5 mg/kg) every 8 weeks if there was lack of response (< 20% improvement from baseline in S/TJC). The study was terminated after 54 weeks (2).

Results: Among the 360 pts randomized to 3 mg/kg, 220 did not receive dose escalation during the study, 109 pts received dose escalation, and 31 discontinued or were from an excluded site. 53 of those receiving dose escalation were primary non-responders with lack of response at week 22 (2). Baseline characteristics were generally similar among these subgroups (80% female, mean 53 years old, SJC=15, TJC=22, and MTX 15 mg/week). Of the primary non-responders (n=53), IFX doses escalated to an average of 6.3 mg/kg (range 4.5 – 10 mg/kg). CDAI scoring (high, moderate, and low) improved from 89%, 9%, and 2% at week 22 to 46%, 24%, and 30% at week 46, and did not substantially improve further at week 54 (Figure 1). Among the subset of these pts who received doses ≥6 mg/kg (n=26), the average IFX dose was 7.7 mg/kg (range 6 – 10 mg/kg), and the CDAI scores (high, moderate, and low) of 92%, 8%, and 0% at week 22 improved to 58%, 27% and 15% at week 46, and also did not substantially improve further at week 54 (Figure 2).

Conclusion: In this analysis of CDAI in pts who initiated IFX 3 mg/kg and were dose escalated starting at week 22 (average dose 6.3 mg/kg), dose escalation generally improved pts’ CDAI category (Figure 1). In a subset of pts who were escalated to doses ≥ 6 mg/kg (average dose 7.65 mg/kg), no further improvements in categorical CDAI were noted (Figure 2). Although START showed no increased risk of serious infections among pts receiving approved doses of INF vs PBO, pts who were treated with 10 mg/kg loading doses and maintenance therapy had more serious infections (relative risk=3.1) (1). These findings may be of clinical significance when considering dose escalation to higher doses of IFX.

  1. Westhovens et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1075.
  2. Rahman et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1233.


Disclosure: J. Tesser, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; S. Black, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC,, 3; R. Lin, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Janssen Research & Development, LLC,, 3; W. Langholff, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; J. Uy, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; S. Kafka, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tesser J, Black S, Lin R, Langholff W, Uy J, Kafka S. CDAI Analysis of Dose Escalation in a Trial of Infliximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cdai-analysis-of-dose-escalation-in-a-trial-of-infliximab-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cdai-analysis-of-dose-escalation-in-a-trial-of-infliximab-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology