ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2437

Causes of Cesarean Section and Labor Induction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis Pregnancies

Amanda M. Eudy, Laura Neil and Megan E. B. Clowse, Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: pregnancy, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Women with SLE and RA have an increased risk of delivering a preterm infant. However, the causes of these preterm births remain unknown. Some theories suggest that maternal inflammation induces preterm labor and/or rupture of membranes. We sought to identify what prompted each preterm delivery, as well as the mode of delivery among a cohort of patients with SLE and RA.

Methods: SLE patients meeting ACR and/or SLICC criteria and RA patients meeting ACR criteria were prospectively followed in a pregnancy registry. Pregnancy outcomes were collected from the patient and medical records. Preterm birth was defined as a birth <37 weeks gestation. Only singleton live births with a visit prior to 25 weeks gestation and data available on mode of delivery were included. At our institution, pregnancies in women with rheumatic diseases are routinely induced at 39 weeks for delivery, regardless of maternal complications. Differences between term and preterm births were determined by Fisher’s exact test.  

Results: Among 82 SLE live births, 46% of mothers were white and 46% were black, with a median maternal age of 30 years. Among 45 RA live births, 78% of mothers were white, with a median maternal age of 35 years. There were 20 preterm births (24%) among SLE pregnancies and 7 preterm births (16%) among RA pregnancies. While only 30% of preterm SLE births were spontaneous, 71% of preterm RA births were spontaneous. The frequency of C-section was greater in patients who had induced compared to spontaneous labor (65% vs. 24%, respectively, for SLE and 52% vs. 8%, respectively, for RA). Among SLE patients, preeclampsia and concern over the health of the mother were the primary drivers behind induced preterm labor and preterm C-sections (Table 1). Preeclampsia was diagnosed in 35% of preterm deliveries compared to 8% of term deliveries (p=0.002). Labor was induced in 70% of preterm births and 55% of term births. The reason for induction differed, however, with 64% of preterm births induced for maternal preeclampsia/hypertension compared to 15% of induced term births (p=0.001). In contrast, among women with RA, C-sections and preterm birth were both less frequent than in SLE, and labor was more often spontaneous. Half of term deliveries were induced, primarily for gestational age, although 21% of term births were induced due to maternal preeclampsia/hypertension and 16% were induced because the infant was not well.

Conclusion: Spontaneous preterm labor does not appear to be driving the high preterm birth rate among women with lupus. Instead, physician-directed labor induction to manage the risks of preeclampsia, placental insufficiency, and lupus activity prompts the majority of preterm births. These results suggest future research attention should focus on placental dysfunction and away from causes of spontaneous preterm labor.  


Disclosure: A. M. Eudy, GSK, 5; L. Neil, None; M. E. B. Clowse, Pfizer, Janssen, 2,UCB Pharma, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eudy AM, Neil L, Clowse MEB. Causes of Cesarean Section and Labor Induction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis Pregnancies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/causes-of-cesarean-section-and-labor-induction-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-rheumatoid-arthritis-pregnancies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/causes-of-cesarean-section-and-labor-induction-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-rheumatoid-arthritis-pregnancies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology