ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2428

Causal Beliefs of Disease Among Patients with Systemic Vasculitis

Peter C. Grayson1, Naomi Amudala2, Carol McAlear3, Renée Leduc4, Denise Shereff5, Rachel Richesson6, Liana Fraenkel7 and Peter A. Merkel8, 1Section of Rheumatology & the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Vasculitis Center, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology & Vasculitis, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 4Pediatrics Epidemiology Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 5Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 6Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 7Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT, 8University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Psychological status and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Psychology/Social Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Patients vary in their beliefs related to the cause of serious illness. The impact of these beliefs among patients with systemic vasculitis is not known. This study aimed to describe patient beliefs related to the cause of systemic vasculitis and to examine whether casual beliefs are associated with psychological impact of disease and functional impairment.

Methods: Participants were recruited online from a patient contact registry in vasculitis. Causal beliefs were measured using two approaches. Using an open-ended question, participants were asked to list the three most important causal beliefs about disease-onset. Responses were categorized and weighted by rank to determine the relative frequency of beliefs. Participants also rated 18 specified causal beliefs (obtained from the well-validated revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, IPQ-R) on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating stronger agreement. Response scores to the specified items were summed into a belief score which defined strength of causal beliefs. Psychological impact was measured using a scale from the IPQ-R assessing the negative emotional impact of vasculitis. The Medical Outcomes Study General Health Survey was used to assess functional impairment (physical, role, and social). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between belief scores, psychological, and functional impairment.

Results: 692 participants with 9 forms of vasculitis were included. There was considerable variability of causal beliefs among participants and beliefs differed by type of vasculitis (Table). The most common beliefs listed by participants using the open-ended approach were environmental exposures (16%), stress (15%), hereditary factors (15%), and infection (15%). For the 18 specified items (scored 1-5), altered immunity (3.6 ±1.1) and stress (3.2 ±1.3) were the most agreed upon causal items for each type of vasculitis. Negative emotional impact of illness, role, and social function were significantly correlated with belief score (r= 0.26, 0.12, 0.12; p<0.01). Physical function was not significantly associated with belief score (r=0.07, p=0.09).

Conclusion: Patient beliefs related to the cause of systemic vasculitis are highly variable. Patients with strongly-held causal beliefs report that their illness has greater negative impact on their psychological well-being and their ability to perform role and social functions. Clinicians who care for patients with vasculitis should be mindful of these associations and consider asking patients about their causal beliefs.

 

 

Table – Frequency (%) of Disease-Onset Causal Beliefs in Systemic Vasculitis

Causal Belief

Total n=692 BD n=48 CNS n=12 CSS n=121 GCA n=32 HSP n=12 MPA n=42 PAN n=36 TAK n=57 GPA n=332

Environmental Exposure

16

9

3

18

12

11

15

1

3

20

Stress

15

12

14

11

17

11

15

13

17

17

Hereditary

15

29

9

11

10

0

13

11

19

15

Infectious

15

23

17

8

6

40

22

18

17

15

Altered Immunity

11

11

13

16

15

13

8

7

17

10

Other Risk Factors*

7

6

11

9

16

7

9

20

7

4

Medications and Vaccines

6

3

0

11

9

18

7

8

3

3

Psychological Factors#

6

3

2

3

5

0

5

6

8

6

Chance

5

2

9

4

2

0

3

7

2

6

Past Medical Problems

4

3

14

7

5

0

2

5

5

3

The most common beliefs per column are highlighted in bold. * Other Risk Factors = diet or eating habits, poor medical care, my own behavior, ageing, alcohol, smoking, accident or injury.  # Psychological Factors = my mental attitude, family problems, my emotional state, overwork, my personality.  BD= Behçet’s disease; CNS= central nervous system vasculitis; CSS= Churg-Strauss syndrome; GCA= giant cell arteritis; HSP= Henoch-Schönlein purpura; MPA= microscopic polyangiitis; PAN= polyarteritis nodosa; TAK= Takayasu’s arteritis; GPA= granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s).

 


Disclosure:

P. C. Grayson,
None;

N. Amudala,
None;

C. McAlear,
None;

R. Leduc,
None;

D. Shereff,
None;

R. Richesson,
None;

L. Fraenkel,
None;

P. A. Merkel,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/causal-beliefs-of-disease-among-patients-with-systemic-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology