ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2611

Cardiovascular Safety of Tocilizumab Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Seoyoung C. Kim1, Daniel H. Solomon1, James R. Rogers1, Sara Gale2, Micki Klearman2, Khaled Sarsour2 and Sebastian Schneeweiss1, 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Genentech, South San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologic agents, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at elevated risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Patients using tocilizumab (TCZ) may experience increased serum lipid levels. It is not known whether TCZ affects the risk for CV events relative to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with RA.

Methods: To examine comparative CV safety, we conducted a cohort study of RA patients who newly started TCZ or a TNFi using claims data from Medicare (2010-2013) or commercial health insurance (IMS Health, 2011-2014; MarketScan, 2011-June 2015). All patients were required to have previously used a different TNFi, abatacept, or tofacitinib. The primary outcome was a composite CV end point of nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke based on a validated claims-based algorithm of high specificity (positive predictive value >94%). For the primary as-treated analysis, follow-up time started the day after TCZ or TNFi initiation and ended on treatment discontinuation plus 30 days, outcome occurrence, disenrollment, death, or end of the study. To control for >90 potential confounders including demographics, previous DMARD use, CV comorbidities, medications, and health care use, TCZ starters were propensity score (PS) matched to TNFi starters, with a variable ratio of 1:3 within each database. We estimated the incidence rate (IR) of composite CV events in the TCZ group compared with the TNFi group separately in each database. Hazard ratios (HRs) from the three PS-matched cohorts were pooled by an inverse variance-weighted, fixed-effects model.

Results: We included 8790 TCZ starters PS matched to 17,821 TNFi starters in all three databases. Mean age of the patients was 72 years in Medicare, 51 in IMS, and 53 in MarketScan. More than 80% of patients were women. At baseline, 72% (Medicare), 73% (IMS), and 66% (MarketScan) of patients used methotrexate. In the as-treated analysis, the median follow-up time varied between 176 days (Medicare) to 205 days (MarketScan) in the TCZ group and 206 days (Medicare) to 231 days (MarketScan) in the TNFi group. Across the three databases, 35 CV events occurred in the TCZ group and 80 occurred in the TNFi group. The IR of composite CV events per 100 person-years ranged from 0.31 (MarketScan) to 0.87 (Medicare) in the TCZ group and from 0.31 (MarketScan) to 1.09 (Medicare) in the TNFi group. The risk for CV events was similar between TCZ and TNFi users across all three databases (Table), with a pooled HR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.60-1.36) from the as-treated analysis. Adjustment for a potential overlap between the commercial cohorts (IMS and MarketScan) yielded consistent results.

Conclusion: This large multi-database cohort study found no increase in the rate of CV events in patients with RA who switched from a biologic agent to either TCZ or a different TNFi.


Disclosure: S. C. Kim, Genentech, BMS, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, 2; D. H. Solomon, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Amgen, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Corrona, 2,UpToDate, 7; J. R. Rogers, Genentech, Lilly, Novartis, 2; S. Gale, Genentech/Roche, 1,Genentech/Roche, 3; M. Klearman, Genentech/Roche, 1,Genentech/Roche, 3; K. Sarsour, Genentech/Roche, 1,Genentech/Roche, 3; S. Schneeweiss, Aetion, 1,Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kim SC, Solomon DH, Rogers JR, Gale S, Klearman M, Sarsour K, Schneeweiss S. Cardiovascular Safety of Tocilizumab Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cardiovascular-safety-of-tocilizumab-versus-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cardiovascular-safety-of-tocilizumab-versus-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology