Session Information
Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015
Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease - Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis Poster
Session Type: ACR Poster Session A
Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM
Background/Purpose:
Bone turnover markers
(BTMs) respond faster than bone mineral density as an indicator of response to
therapy in osteoporotic patients; however, it remains unclear when and how best
to evaluate treatment response using BTMs. Denosumab (DMAb) has a dynamic BTM
profile over the 6-month dosing period (ie, reduction in turnover with release
of inhibition at the end of the dosing interval). This analysis assessed
the use of potential target values for serum C-telopeptide of type 1
collagen
(CTX) and serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) to explore
guidance to clinicians for monitoring postmenopausal
women with osteoporosis (PMO) during treatment.
Methods:
BTMs measured at
baseline in treatment-naïve PMO entering FREEDOM, a large randomized,
placebo-controlled study of DMAb (Cummings et al NEJM 2009), were used
to derive threshold values at the 5th percentiles of the observed distributions. The
relevant values for serum CTX (N = 7594) and P1NP (N = 1023) were 0.2 ng/mL and 25.8
ng/mL, respectively. These BTM target
values were applied to the study
populations of DECIDE (Brown et al JBMR 2009) and STAND (Kendler et al JBMR
2010) enabling evaluation of a population-based assessment of BTM target
values. DECIDE (N = 1189) and STAND (N = 504) were phase 3, randomized,
double-blind, double-dummy studies to compare the efficacy and safety of DMAb
(60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months) with alendronate (ALN; 70 mg weekly oral
tablet) in treatment-naïve PMO or PMO already receiving ALN, respectively. The
percentage of subjects in each treatment group with BTMs below the predefined target
values was evaluated
midcycle at month 3 after the 1st dose of DMAb, which also enabled trough values for ALN, and then re-evaluated
at month 9. Subjects with BTM values below the predefined targets at baseline were excluded from the analysis.
Results:
A
total of 1112 (93.5%) women in
DECIDE and 155 (30.8%) women in STAND had CTX values ≥ 0.2 ng/mL and
P1NP values ≥ 25.8 ng/mL at baseline. Table 1 reports the percentage of subjects with CTX
and P1NP values below the respective targets at months 3 and 9. The predefined
target values were almost universally achieved at 3 and 9 months on DMAb,
whereas the target for CTX, for example, on ALN was only achieved in 49.1% and
19.0% of treatment-naïve and ALN-pretreated PMO, respectively, at month 3.
Conclusion:
In this population-based analysis, in
both treatment-naïve and pretreated PMO, BTMs have utility in determining
response, and awareness of failure to reach a treatment target may help improve
clinical management.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Brown J, Dakin P, Hadji P, McClung M, Miller P, Reginster JY, Wagman R, Wang A, McCloskey E. Can We Use Bone Turnover Markers As Targets for Antiresorptive Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis? an Analysis from Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-use-bone-turnover-markers-as-targets-for-antiresorptive-treatment-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-an-analysis-from-two-phase-3-clinical-trials/. Accessed .« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-we-use-bone-turnover-markers-as-targets-for-antiresorptive-treatment-in-postmenopausal-osteoporosis-an-analysis-from-two-phase-3-clinical-trials/