ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • Search
  • My Favorites
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all favorites

Abstract Number: 2234

Can the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Also Predict Falls in Older Women?

Shreyasee Amin1, Elizabeth J. Atkinson2, Sara J. Achenbach2, Jeremy R. Crenshaw3, Kenton R. Kaufman3, Sundeep Khosla4 and L. Joseph Melton III2, 1Rheumatology and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 3Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 4Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2015

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Fall Risk and fracture risk

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III (ACR): Gout and Non-Inflammatory Musculoskeletal Conditions

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Falls in the elderly can lead to fragility
fractures. Fall prevention targeted at those with high risk for falls could
help reduce fractures. Although the fracture risk assessment tool, FRAX, does
not directly incorporate fall risk, it does include some risk factors for falls.
We examined whether FRAX could predict fall risk in older ambulatory women.

Methods: We studied 125 community-dwelling
women, age ≥ 65 years, in whom 124 had femoral neck bone mineral density (FN
BMD, g/cm2) and US-FRAX scores (% 10-yr risk for major osteoporotic
fractures [FRAX-OP] and hip fractures [FRAX-Hip]) reliably determined at
baseline. Falls were tracked longitudinally every two weeks over 1 year by
self-reported questionnaire. We examined fall risk for FRAX-OP and FRAX-Hip
scores separately. For analyses, we created 4 groups for each FRAX score, using
FRAX score cutoffs for osteoporosis [OP] treatment (≥20% for FRAX-OP and
≥3% for FRAX-Hip) as the initial basis for groupings. We then examined
whether FRAX scores (by groups and also as a continuous variable) predicted
falls using an Andersen-Gill model, adjusted for age and prior fall history.

Results: The median (range) age, FN BMD and
FRAX scores of women were 77 (65-92 years), 0.81 (0.54-1.20 g/cm2),
14.2 (3.3-56.9%, FRAX-OP) and 3.5 (0.1-45.8%, FRAX-Hip), respectively. There
were 28 women (23%) with FRAX-OP ≥20% and 67 (53%) with FRAX-Hip
≥3%. There were 47 women (38%) who reported a fall in the year prior to
their study visit. Compliance with all fall tracking questionnaires was 97.5%. Over
follow-up, 73 women fell, 38 of whom had more than one fall, for a total of 157
falls over 125 person-years of follow-up [p-y] (1.3 falls/p-y). There was a
trend for higher fall risk with greater FRAX score group (FRAX-OP, p=0.17; FRAX-Hip,
p=0.02) [Table]. But the association appeared non-linear when using FRAX
as a continuous variable in analyses, with decreasing fall risk in women having
the very highest (>25%, FRAX-OP and >10%, FRAX-Hip) scores [data not
shown]. Women with some of the highest FRAX scores were more likely to have a
parent with hip fracture, increasing the FRAX score, but which may not
necessarily have influenced fall risk. They also reported being less active, which
may have reduced their likelihood for falling over follow-up.

Conclusion: We found a higher risk of future falls
in older women with greater FRAX scores, including at some scores below the recommendations
for OP treatment. That said, the non-linear association we observed at the
highest FRAX scores suggests that information beyond FRAX would still be
necessary to distinguish those at high vs. low fall risk.

 

FRAX-OP Score [%]

(N per Group)

Falls/

P-Y

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

FRAX-Hip Score [%]

(N per Group)

Falls/

P-Y

Hazard Ratio

(95% CI)

<10 (N=26)

0.8

referent

<1.5 (N=31)

0.8

referent

10-14.9 (N=41)

1.2

1.9 (0.8, 4.3)

1.5-2.9 (N=26)

0.9

1.3 (0.7, 2.6)

15-19.9 (N=29)

1.5

2.3 (1.1, 4.9)

3.0-5.9 (N=37)

2.0

2.5 (1.3, 4.9)

≥20 (N=28)

1.5

2.6 (1.1, 6.3)

≥6 (N=30)

1.2

1.8 (0.9, 3.9)

 


Disclosure: S. Amin, None; E. J. Atkinson, None; S. J. Achenbach, None; J. R. Crenshaw, None; K. R. Kaufman, None; S. Khosla, None; L. J. Melton III, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Crenshaw JR, Kaufman KR, Khosla S, Melton LJ III. Can the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Also Predict Falls in Older Women? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-the-fracture-risk-assessment-tool-frax-also-predict-falls-in-older-women/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2015

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-the-fracture-risk-assessment-tool-frax-also-predict-falls-in-older-women/

Advanced Search

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology