ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 352

Can Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Predict Readmission in Denosumab-Treated Chronic Kidney Disease Patients?

Ying-Chou Chen Sr., Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan., YC Chen, Kaohsiung County, Taiwan

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Denosumab and osteoporosis, Kidney

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis - Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  This study investigated whether bone mineral density (BMD) affects readmission risk in patients with CKD who received denosumab therapy.

Methods: The study design was a retrospective case review of CKD patients. Baseline age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded for all patients included in the study. All comorbidities were recorded. All subjects underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry assay of the lumbar spine and right hip for BMD. The primary outcome was readmission. Predictive variables were categorized and compared between readmitted and non-readmitted patients. Logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis.

Results: A total 121 patients with CKD who received denosumab therapy were enrolled. Of these, 29 were readmitted within 2 years, and 92 had no readmission. The lumbar BMD differed between the readmission (-2.94±0.68) and non-readmission group (-2.09±1.48). The readmission group had a lower T score than the non-readmission group. When adjusted for potential confounding factors, a decreased lumbar BMD had a higher readmission risk. When the cut-off points determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were applied, the most precise point was set at a T score of -3(Table).

Conclusion: Osteoporosis in CKD patients is associated with a high risk of readmission; the best predictor after denosumab therapy was the lumbar spine T score. A lower T score (especially if less than -3) was associated with a higher probability of fracture readmission. It is essential to optimize primary and secondary prevention in these patients to improve their quality of life.

Table . Multivariable analysis of the odds ratios for readmission  
Variables Regression coefficient S.E. Wald P- value OR (95%CI)  
 
Age (years) -0.001 0.033 0.001 0.971 0.998 (0.936-1.065)
Gender -0.317 0.739 0.183 0.668 0.728 (0.171-3.102)
Body mass index (kg/m2) -0.037 0.073 0.259 0.611 0.963 (0.836-1.111)
Spine fracture (number) 0.12 0.188 0.404 0.525 1.127 (0.779-1.631)
BMD (lumbar) -0.673 0.248 7.369 0.007 1.960 (1.206-3.189)
BMD (Total hip) -0.336 0.548 0.377 0.539 0.714 (0.244-2.090)
BMD (Femoral neck) -0.165 0.587 0.079 0.779 0.847 (0.269-2.677)
Neurological disease 0.763 0.69 1.222 0.269 2.143 (0.555-8.289)
Diabetes mellitus 0.367 0.623 0.348 0.556 1.443 (0.426-4.897)
Hypertension 0.151 0.639 0.056 0.813 1.163 (0.333-4.067)
Hyperlipidemia 0.857 1.049 0.667 0.414 2.355 (0.301-18.405)
Cardiovascular disease 0.117 0.691 0.029 0.865 1.124 (0.290-4.357)
Pulmonary disease -0.116 0.861 0.018 0.893 0.890 (0.165-4.813)
Liver disease -0.705 0.832 0.717 0.397 0.4941 (0.097-2.526)  
   
OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error  
 

Disclosure: Y. C. Chen Sr., None;

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chen YC Sr.. Can Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Predict Readmission in Denosumab-Treated Chronic Kidney Disease Patients? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-lumbar-spine-bone-mineral-density-predict-readmission-in-denosumab-treated-chronic-kidney-disease-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-lumbar-spine-bone-mineral-density-predict-readmission-in-denosumab-treated-chronic-kidney-disease-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology