ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1057

Budgetary Impact Analysis of Real-World Dosing Patterns in Matched Cohorts of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Infliximab or Golimumab Intravenous Anti-TNF Medications

Lorie A. Ellis1, Elisabetta Malangone-Monaco2, Helen Varker2, Diana Stetsovsky3, Maureen Kubacki4, Raphael J. DeHoratius5 and Shelly Kafka4, 1Janssen HECOR Immunology, Horsham, PA, 2Truven Health Analytics, Bethesda, MD, 3Truven Health Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, 4Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 5Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC/Sidney Kimmel School of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Horsham/Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, infliximab and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Health Services Research Poster II: Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Infliximab (IFX) is more frequently selected than golimumab for intravenous use (GLM-IV) in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) but differences in dosing and administration recommendations for these products may have budgetary consequences. This study aimed to determine the budgetary impact of IFX and GLM-IV based upon real-world treatment patterns and commercial reimbursement in a matched sample of RA patients.

Methods: Truven Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental data were used to evaluate maintenance infusion interval, frequency of first or subsequent hour billing code and cost of infusions for adult RA patients starting a new episode of IFX (J1745) or GLM-IV (J1604). Adult patients with ≥12 months continuous enrollment before and after the 1st IFX or GLM-IV claim (index) between 1/1/2014 and 3/31/2016 and no evidence of index medication use 12 months before index were studied. IFX and GLM-IV patients were matched 1:1 on index medication treatment duration, gender, payer type, prior-biologic use and post-index methotrexate (MTX). The payer paid drug plus administration cost was used applied to population treatment patterns. Descriptive statistics summarized key variables (mean, SD, median, n, %). Chi-squared tests determined differences between categorical variables and t-test was used for continuous variables.

Results: A total of 1,094 matched patients were identified (n=547 GLM-IV; n=547 IFX). In both groups, median age was 56 years; 82% were female and 38% had no prior biologic use. Mean (SD) follow-up was 609 (161) days (d) for GLM-IV and 613 (163) days for IFX. Mean (SD) duration of GLM-IV use was 396 (240) d and 397 (239) d for IFX. A total of 3,961 GLM-IV infusions and 4,716 IFX infusions were administered. The proportion of maintenance infusions given every 8 wk was 80% for GLM-IV vs 39% for IFX; 6% of GLM-IV vs 53% of IFX infusions occurred more frequently than every 8 wk (P<0.0001). Mean drug plus administration cost per infusion was $5,846.10 (GLM-IV) and $5,443.66(IFX). Mean GLM-IV administration cost was $224.26 with <1% of infusions having a second hour billing code vs IFX with mean administration cost of $360.36 and 96% of IFX infusions requiring a second hour billing code (P<0.0001). Based upon the average maintenance infusion interval, GLM-IV patients cost approximately $10,507 less than IFX patients in the first year and approximately $6,774 less than IFX patients in subsequent years.

Conclusion: From the commercial health plan perspective, annual GLM-IV drug plus administration cost was less than IFX in RA patients due to differences in real-world dosing and administration. These findings have important implications for population health decision makers.


Disclosure: L. A. Ellis, Janssen, 3,Johnson & Johnson, LLC, 1; E. Malangone-Monaco, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 5; H. Varker, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 5; D. Stetsovsky, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 5; M. Kubacki, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 3; R. J. DeHoratius, Johnson & Johnson, 3; S. Kafka, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 3,Johnson & Johnson, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ellis LA, Malangone-Monaco E, Varker H, Stetsovsky D, Kubacki M, DeHoratius RJ, Kafka S. Budgetary Impact Analysis of Real-World Dosing Patterns in Matched Cohorts of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Infliximab or Golimumab Intravenous Anti-TNF Medications [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/budgetary-impact-analysis-of-real-world-dosing-patterns-in-matched-cohorts-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-infliximab-or-golimumab-intravenous-anti-tnf-medications/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/budgetary-impact-analysis-of-real-world-dosing-patterns-in-matched-cohorts-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-infliximab-or-golimumab-intravenous-anti-tnf-medications/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology