ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2173

Budget Impact of Etanercept Versus Adalimumab for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Biologic-Naïve Patients in the United Kingdom

Kateryna Onishchenko1, Miriam Tarallo2, Cinzia Curiale2 and Stamatia Theodora Alexopoulos1, 1Consulting at McCann Health, London, United Kingdom, 2Pfizer, Rome, Italy

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, Cost containment and etanercept

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Health Services Research Poster III – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Etanercept and adalimumab are TNFα inhibitors, both indicated in the UK for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe active RA who had inadequate response to DMARDs. The objective of this study was to assess the cost impact of etanercept compared to adalimumab when considering dose escalation.

Methods: A budget impact model was developed to assess the drug cost impact of etanercept versus adalimumab, from the perspective of the UK national healthcare payer over a one-year time horizon. The modelled population represented 79,762 patients with RA who were biologic-naïve (previously failed on DMARDs) and who were treated with either etanercept or adalimumab. Clinical inputs in the model included response to treatment (ACR 20% improvement), with patients who did not respond to the initial dose experiencing dose escalation. Applying Phase III trial data, 65% of patients treated with etanercept and 53% of patients treated with adalimumab responded to their initial dose within 3 months. Based on a published systematic literature review, the model assumed a weighted mean of 14.9% of patients who did not respond to the initial dose of adalimumab and subsequently received dose escalation. Dose escalation was not considered for etanercept as it is not specified in the label. Drug costs were taken from published UK sources. Primary model outcomes were the total costs of etanercept versus adalimumab cohorts and net budget impact over one year. Medical writing assistance was provided by Vojislav Pejović, PhD, of Engage Scientific Services, and was sponsored by Pfizer.

Results: Annual drug costs in the adalimumab and etanercept UK cohorts were £768.4 million and £741.4 million, respectively. Treatment with adalimumab resulted in a £27.0 million increased spend compared to the etanercept cohort. Alternative scenarios around dose escalation were explored and were consistent with base case findings.

Conclusion: Treatment with etanercept may yield cost savings versus adalimumab in the UK for biologic-naïve patients with RA, when considering adalimumab dose escalation.


Disclosure: K. Onishchenko, Consulting at McCann Health, 3,Consulting at McCann Health, 5; M. Tarallo, Pfizer, Inc., 1,Pfizer, Inc., 3; C. Curiale, Pfizer, Inc., 1,Pfizer, Inc., 3; S. T. Alexopoulos, Consulting at McCann Health, 3,Consulting at McCann Health, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Onishchenko K, Tarallo M, Curiale C, Alexopoulos ST. Budget Impact of Etanercept Versus Adalimumab for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Biologic-Naïve Patients in the United Kingdom [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/budget-impact-of-etanercept-versus-adalimumab-for-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-biologic-naive-patients-in-the-united-kingdom/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/budget-impact-of-etanercept-versus-adalimumab-for-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-biologic-naive-patients-in-the-united-kingdom/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology