ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1019

Brain Functional Connectivity Differentially Predicts Response to Two Centrally Acting Analgesics in Fibromyalgia

Eric Ichesco1, Johnson Hampson2, Lynne Pauer3, Andrew Clair4, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke5, David A. Williams6, Daniel J. Clauw2 and Richard E. Harris1, 1Anesthesiology, U. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Pfizer Inc, New London, CT, 4Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, 5Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany, 6Anesthseiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: fibromyalgia and pain, FMRI

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Pain: Basic Aspects

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Recently, several functional brain imaging techniques including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have been proposed to be useful in probing the mechanisms of action of centrally acting analgesics.  In parallel, our group has utilized brain resting state functional connectivity (fcMRI) outcomes to predict clinical pain response in fibromyalgia (FM) to pregabalin (PGB) and milnacipran (MLN), two known efficacious compounds.  While preclinical work suggests that the mechanisms of action of these drugs may differ, a key hurdle in the identification of novel acting central analgesics would be the ability to differentially predict clinical response to different compounds in humans.

Methods: 29 female FM patients were included in this study: 14 underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study with the administration of PGB, and15 were enrolled in a similar study with MLN. All patients underwent a 6 minute fcMRI scan pre-treatment for both the drug and placebo periods. Patients also reported clinical pain pre- and post-treatment using a 0-10 rating scale.  fcMRI data were analyzed with an a priori regions of interest approach using the Conn toolbox running through SPM8 and Matlab. Regions previously identified as predictive for PGB and MLN in isolation were cross-utilized in both data sets.  Seeds included: the insula, rostral and genual anterior cingulate, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), periaqueductal gray, and amygdala. Prediction results were analyzed in SPM8 with a multiple regression that included seed-to-whole brain correlation maps with clinical pain difference scores. Results were significant on the cluster level with a false discovery rate p value < 0.05 derived from an uncorrected voxel level p value < 0.001.

Results: Reduced functional connectivity between the right DLPFC (seed) to both the inferior parietal lobule (r = 0.94 p < 0.001) and inferior/mid temporal gyrus (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) was associated with greater subsequent reduction in clinical pain for MLN, but not PGB. In contrast, greater connectivity between the rostral ACC (seed) to the subgenual ACC (r = – 0.91, p < 0.001) and the left amygdala (seed) to the left insula/sensory motor cortex (r= – 0.96, p < 0.001) and the primary motor cortex (r= – 0.89, p=0.01) was associated with subsequent reduction in pain for PGB, but not MLN. Furthermore, connectivity between the right periaqueductal gray (seed) to the precuneus (r= – 0.89, p = 0.02) and between the right anterior insula (seed) to the precuneus (r= -0.86, p = 0.042) was associated with reduction in pain to PGB, but not MLN.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate that fcMRI can differentially predict clinical response to two efficacious analgesics in FM, thus providing evidence that these compounds may have differing mechanisms of action.  As suspected from preclinical data, it appears that SNRIs such as milnacipran may be acting partly by increasing fcMRI to brain regions involved in anti-nociception, whereas gabapentinoids such as pregabalin may be acting by decreasing fcMRI to pro-nociceptive regions. This provides some rationale for the common clinical practice of using these two classes of drugs in chronic pain states.


Disclosure: E. Ichesco, None; J. Hampson, None; L. Pauer, Pfizer Inc, 3; A. Clair, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; T. Schmidt-Wilcke, None; D. A. Williams, Health Focus Inc., 5; D. J. Clauw, Abbott Laboratories, 5,Cerephex, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5,Forrest Laboratories, 5,Johnson & Johnson, 5,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Purdue Pharma L.P., 5,Samumed, 5,Theravance, 5,Tonix, 5,UCB, 5,Zynerba, 5,Abbott Laboratories, 6,Cerephex, 6,Eli Lilly and Company, 6,Forest Laboratories, 6,Johnson & Johnson, 6,Merck Pharmaceuticals, 6,Pfizer Inc, 6,Purdue Pharma L.P., 6,Samumed, 6,Theravance, 6,Tonix, 6,UCB, 6,Zynerba, 6; R. E. Harris, Pfizer, Inc., 2,Pfizer, Inc., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ichesco E, Hampson J, Pauer L, Clair A, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Williams DA, Clauw DJ, Harris RE. Brain Functional Connectivity Differentially Predicts Response to Two Centrally Acting Analgesics in Fibromyalgia [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/brain-functional-connectivity-differentially-predicts-response-to-two-centrally-acting-analgesics-in-fibromyalgia/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/brain-functional-connectivity-differentially-predicts-response-to-two-centrally-acting-analgesics-in-fibromyalgia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology