ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1164

Both Endosomal and Surface Toll-Like Receptors Can Act As Biomarkers In Lupus

Maria Perez-Ferro1, Cristina Serrano2, Fredeswinda I. Romero1, María J Martínez-Becerra2, Jorge E Rojas3, María Sanchez-Blazquez2, Raquel Largo4, Juan A Martínez-López5, Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont4 and Olga Sanchez-Pernaute1, 1Section for Autoimmune Diseases, Rheumatology, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 2Immunology, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 3Nephrology, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 4Bone and Joint Research Unit, IIS, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 5Rheumatology, Section for Autoimmune Diseases, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus and toll-like receptors

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Innate Immunity and Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Toll-like receptors (TLR) are a major class of pathogen detectors in the cell that can trigger the innate defense and lead to activation of immunocompetent cells. Endosomal TLR have been recently associated to the pathogenesis of SLE and to the production of autoantibodies. In this study we have explored associations between TLR and disease phenotypes, which could help us understand pathogenesis and find biomarkers in specific subgroups of patients.

Methods:

Thirty four patients diagnosed with lupus and 12 matched healthy controls were recruited. Patients had stable treatment during the last 4 weeks prior to recruitment. Cumulative features, and serologic markers were registered. Selena-SLEDAI and BILAG scales were employed to measure disease activity. The distribution of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) subpopulations and their expression of TLR2, TLR4, TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9 were analyzed in patients and controls with flow cytometry. Statistics were carried out with Spearman’s correlation and Mann Whitney tests for independent samples, setting significance at 95%. The relationship between dual variables was assessed with contingency tables and Fisher’s exact test, setting significance at 99%.

Results:

The appearance of TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9 in lymphoplasmocytoid (CD19lp) cells was higher in SLE than in healthy controls. The presence of TLR3 in CD19 cells (n = 9) was associated to active disease (p 0.006), hypocomplementemia ( p 0.002), and SLEDAI and BILAG scores (p 0.018, p 0.012). SLEDAI scores were also higher in patients with TLR9 expression in CD19 cells (n= 14, p 0.044). The percentage of CD19lp cells expressing TLR3, and TLR9 increased with SLEDAI scores (rho 0.401, p 0.021; and rho 0.403, p 0.02,respectively), but not with other activity measures.

Subgroups of patients with TLR2 expression in CD3+ cells (n = 5) or in CD19+ cells (n = 6) displayed higher activity as reflected by SLEDAI (p 0.05, p 0.015) and BILAG (p 0.005, p 0.004) scores. Patients with TLR4 in CD3+ cells (n = 5) or in CD19+ cells (n = 6), showed higher SLEDAI scores (p 0.05, p 0.045), while presence of TLR4 in CD19+ and in monocytes (n = 5) were associated to higher BILAG scores (p 0.004, p 0.005). Serological markers of activity were also found more frequently in patients showing expression of TLR2 or TLR4 in PBMC. Furthermore, the appearance of TLR2 or TLR4 in CD19+ cells, CD3+ cells or monocytes was associated with renal disease and with major organ involvement. Interestingly, patients with positive past history for bacterial or viral infections more often showed TLR2 and TLR4 in CD3 and CD19+ cells, and TLR4 in monocytes (CI 99%).

Conclusion:

Endosomal TLR were found significantly enhanced in patients with lupus compared to controls, and TLR3 and TLR9 expression by CDlp cells could be used as a biomarker of disease activity. However, the induction of TLR2 and TLR4 in different PBMC subsets identified a subgroup of patients with high activity, whom frequently displayed major organ involvement. Our data suggest that there could be a subgroup of patients with lupus, in whom exposure to germs could sensitize immunocompetent cells, and facilitate their activation during flares.


Disclosure:

M. Perez-Ferro,
None;

C. Serrano,
None;

F. I. Romero,
None;

M. J. Martínez-Becerra,
None;

J. E. Rojas,
None;

M. Sanchez-Blazquez,
None;

R. Largo,
None;

J. A. Martínez-López,
None;

G. Herrero-Beaumont,
None;

O. Sanchez-Pernaute,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/both-endosomal-and-surface-toll-like-receptors-can-act-as-biomarkers-in-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology