ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1958

Bone Mineral Density in Lupus Erythematosus Women One Year After Rituximab Therapy

Claudia Mendoza-Pinto1, Mario Garcia-Carrasco1, Mario Jiménez-Hernández1, Alma Rodríguez-Gallegos2, Socorro Méndez-Martínez1 and Aurelio Lopez-Colombo3, 1Systemic Autoimmune Disease, HGR 36 CMN Manuel Ávila Camacho, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Puebla, Mexico, 2Laboratorios Clínicos de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico, 3Research Departament, Delegación Estatal, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Puebla, Mexico

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bone density, rituximab and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis may be significant complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Recent studies have shown that biologic therapy could arrest general bone loss, however, the role of  rituximab on BMD in SLE patients has not been analyzed. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effects of rituximab on BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in women with SLE, one year after rituximab therapy.

Methods: Thirty active female SLE patients treated with rituximab were compared with control SLE women not treated with rituximab. In those patients, rituximab 1 g was administered on days 1 and 15 in addition to current immunosuppressive treatment, which was maintained until disease remission. Since all patients were using steroids when rituximab therapy began, they were all taking calcium and vitamin D. Historical controls included forty-six SLE women with similar lupus activity treated with conventional therapy azathoprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide and cyclophosphamide) without rituximab therapy. BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry before initiating conventional and biologic therapy and after one year.

Results: Seventy-six patients were studied. The mean age was 38.5 ± 2.1 SD, median disease duration was 7 years (range 1 to 26). Thirty patients received rituximab and forty- six controls received conventional treatment. Baseline BMD measurements were higher in the rituximab group. In the rituximab group, after 1 year of follow up femoral neck BMD decreased from 0.980 ± 0.130 g/cm2 to 0.809 ± 0.139 g/cm2 (-17.4%; p = 0.001). Similarly, lumbar spine BMD decreased from 1.062 ± 0.137 g/ cm2 to 0.893 ± 0.194 g/ cm2 (-15.8%; p= 0.001). In controls, femoral neck BMD decreased from 0.914 ± 0.193 g/cm2 to 0.890 ± 0.135 g/cm2 (-2.6%; p= 0.001) and lumbar spine BMD decreased from 0.926 ± 0.128 g/cm2 to 0.867 ± 0.139 g/cm2 (- 6.2%; p= 0.09). BMD loss was higher in postmenopausal rituximab patients than in postmenopausal controls (0.324 ± 0.128 g/cm2 vs 0.138 ± 0.099 g/cm2). There was a significant difference in BMD at the femoral neck between responders and nonresponders (p = 0.014) but not in BMD at the lumbar spine.

Conclusion: After one year of follow up, SLE patients had lower BMD at both the femoral neck and lumbar spine, but the loss was greater in patients receiving rituximab than in patients receiving conventional treatment, and in postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal candidates for rituximab should be evaluated closely to prevent further BMD loss.


Disclosure:

C. Mendoza-Pinto,
None;

M. Garcia-Carrasco,
None;

M. Jiménez-Hernández,
None;

A. Rodríguez-Gallegos,
None;

S. Méndez-Martínez,
None;

A. Lopez-Colombo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bone-mineral-density-in-lupus-erythematosus-women-one-year-after-rituximab-therapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology