ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 831

Bisphosphonates and Risk of Acute Pseudogout: A Case-Control Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

Edward Roddy, Sara Muller, Zoe Paskins, Samantha Hider, Milisa Blagojevic-Bucknall and Christian Mallen, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bisphosphonates, Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD), epidemiologic methods and pseudogout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies I: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Acute pseudogout is the most dramatic clinical manifestation of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD). CPPD is most commonly sporadic and age-related but can rarely occur secondary to metabolic diseases or a familial trait. Published case reports also suggest that acute pseudogout can occur as a consequence of bisphosphonate therapy. This matched case-control study aimed to examine whether acute pseudogout is associated with bisphosphonate prescription with the preceding 60 days.

Methods: The study was nested within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) which houses clinical data from over 600 general practices. Cases aged ≥18 years with a first-ever diagnosis of pseudogout between 01/03/1987 and 31/12/2012 were individually matched for age, gender and practice to four controls without pseudogout. The exposure of interest was prescription of an oral bisphosphonate in the 60 days prior to the diagnosis of pseudogout. It was estimated that 2147 eligible cases of pseudogout would be identified conferring 98% power to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0. Unadjusted conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between oral bisphosphonate prescriptions and pseudogout and then adjusted for hyperparathyroidism, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and prescription of diuretics and corticosteroids. Analyses were then repeated for individual bisphosphonates. In order to address the possibility of misdiagnosis of crystal arthritis, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken excluding cases or controls who had a prior diagnosis of gout. ORs were presented as incident rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). 

Results: 2011 cases of incident pseudogout were identified and successfully matched to 8013 controls (mean age 72 years; male 52%). Those with incident pseudogout were more likely than controls to have received a bisphosphonate prescription in the preceding 60 days (6.1% vs 3.8%; IRR 1.69; 95%CI 1.35, 2.11). On multivariate analysis, this association attenuated slightly (IRR 1.33; 95%CI 1.05, 1.69). A similar significant association was seen for prescription of alendronic acid (multivariate IRR 1.35; 95%CI 1.02, 1.79) but not etidronate disodium, risedronate sodium, ibandronic acid or sodium clodronate although the absolute number of prescriptions for these drugs was small. After excluding known cases of gout, multivariate associations with both any bisphosphonate (IRR 1.43; 95%CI 1.11, 1.84) and alendronic acid (IRR 1.53; 95%CI 1.14, 2.06) remained.

Conclusion: Bisphosphonate prescription appears to be a risk factor for pseudogout, independent of co-morbid conditions and medications. Prescribers should be aware of this uncommon cause of acute pseudogout.


Disclosure:

E. Roddy,
None;

S. Muller,
None;

Z. Paskins,
None;

S. Hider,
None;

M. Blagojevic-Bucknall,
None;

C. Mallen,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bisphosphonates-and-risk-of-acute-pseudogout-a-case-control-study-in-the-clinical-practice-research-datalink-cprd/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology