ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1046

Biological and Targeted Synthetic Dmards’ Prior Authorization Time Is Significantly Reduced with Pharmacy Presence in the Rheumatology Clinic

Wendy Ramey1, Kristine M. Lohr2, Matt Zeltner1, Haley Herrell Postonl1, Andrew Johannemann1, Aric D. Schadler1 and Aleksander Lenert3, 1University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 2Rheumatology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 3Internal Medicine, Div. of Rheumatology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents, Clinical practice, Pharmacists, prior authorization and rheumatic disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Health Services Research Poster II: Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment with biological DMARDs (bDMARD) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARD) has led to improved outcomes for chronic rheumatic diseases. Current treat-to-target (T2T) strategy relies on quick escalation in therapy to achieve disease control. A delay in escalation of therapy may impact clinical outcomes adversely. Insurance prior authorization, required for specialty DMARD approval, represents a significant bottleneck to care. Clinical pharmacists embedded in a collaborative clinical team could optimize rheumatologic care by shortening time to specialty medication authorization. Our aim was to assess the impact of pharmacy support on specialty DMARD approval in an academic rheumatology clinic.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patient records followed in the Rheumatology Clinics at the University of Kentucky who were prescribed specialty medications for RA, PsA and AS. All patients were diagnosed by clinical rheumatologists and met ACR, CASPAR or ASAS criteria respectively. We included 8 bDMARDs and 2 tsDMARDs currently prescribed. We collected data during two 6 month periods from prescriptions written pre-pharmacy (1/2014-6/2014) and post-pharmacy establishment (1/2016-6/2016). We excluded the transition to pharmacist period of 7/2014-12/2015. Our primary outcome was the time to authorization defined as time (in days) between rheumatologist’s prescribing and pharmacist’s completion of authorization for a given specialty DMARD. We compared the mean time to authorization pre- and post-pharmacist establishment in the rheumatology clinic. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 23; continuous variables were analyzed utilizing an independent samples t-test and categorical variables with Pearson’s chi-square test.

Results: We screened 423 specialty prescriptions; 112 were eligible for study inclusion. Thirty-one specialty prescriptions from 28 patients were completed pre-pharmacist (Group 1) and 81 specialty prescriptions from 71 patients were completed post-pharmacist (Group 2) (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline characteristics that were tested including age, gender, diagnosis, and type of insurance. The majority of patients were women with RA; most patients had commercial insurance or Medicaid. The mean time to authorization was significantly shorter post-pharmacist compared to pre-pharmacist routine care (6.43±15.48 vs. 52.03±58.64 days, p=0.002).

Conclusion: In a large tertiary academic rheumatology practice, the mean time to authorization of specialty DMARDs was significantly reduced to <7 days with establishment of a clinical pharmacist in a collaborative clinical team, facilitating implementation of T2T strategy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: W. Ramey, None; K. M. Lohr, None; M. Zeltner, None; H. Herrell Postonl, None; A. Johannemann, None; A. D. Schadler, None; A. Lenert, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ramey W, Lohr KM, Zeltner M, Herrell Postonl H, Johannemann A, Schadler AD, Lenert A. Biological and Targeted Synthetic Dmards’ Prior Authorization Time Is Significantly Reduced with Pharmacy Presence in the Rheumatology Clinic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biological-and-targeted-synthetic-dmards-prior-authorization-time-is-significantly-reduced-with-pharmacy-presence-in-the-rheumatology-clinic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biological-and-targeted-synthetic-dmards-prior-authorization-time-is-significantly-reduced-with-pharmacy-presence-in-the-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology