ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2036

Biologic Therapy For Relapsing Polychondritis: Old and New Efficacy Indices

Mattia Baldini1, Patrizia Aiello1, Mirta Tiraboschi1, Maria Grazia Sabbadini2 and Elena Baldissera1, 1Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Ospedale San Raffaele and Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy, 2Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Anakinra, anti-TNF therapy, Biologic agents, polychondritis and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases II: Miscellaneous Rheumatic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The inflammatory milieu in affected tissues from Relapsing Polychondritis (RP) is rich in TNF-α, IL-1-β and IL-6. Cytokine-targeted biologic therapies has therefore been proposed in patients with active disease despite conventional treatment (steroids + DMARDs). Given the rarity of the disease, no randomized controlled trial has been published yet; moreover, different outcomes are considered in each study. Recently, an international study group published Relapsing Polychondritis Disease Activity Index (RPDAI). We report our experience on the efficacy of biologic therapy in RP evaluating both conventional indexes and the RPDAI.

Methods: The efficacy of each drug has been assessed considering the reduction of ESR, CRP, steroid dose and RPDAI at two time points (6 months, 12 months).

Results: From 2004 on 8 RP patients have been treated with biologic therapies. Anti-TNF (i.e. etanercept, n=4; infliximab, n=1; golimumab, n=1) or anakinra were used as 1st line biologics in 6 and 2 patients, respectively. In the anti-TNF group: 2 patients (both on etanercept) achieved long-term remission (mean follow-up 54 months and one could discontinue the drug without disease flare), while 4 were switched to anakinra (n=2) or to another anti-TNF (n=2) after a mean of 25 months because of efficacy loss (n=3) or intolerable injection-site reaction (n=1). Both patients on 1st line anakinra therapy were switched to etanercept after a mean of 17 months because of efficacy loss. Among the patients on 2nd line biologic therapy, 2 (out of 4) from the anti-TNF group (on etanercept and adalimumab, respectively) and 1 (out of 2) from the anakinra group achieved long-term remission (mean follow-up 43 months). Tocilizumab was successfully used as a 3rd line agent after anti-TNF (n=2) or anakinra (n=1) failure (mean follow-up 7.5 months). In total, 17 biologic therapies have been used in 8 patients. Anti-TNF agents (n=9), and in particular etanercept (n=6) were the most used biologics, followed by anakinra (n=4), and tocilizumab (n=3). At 6 months, tocilizumab was effective in 100% of cases (n=3), anakinra in 50%, ant-TNF in 12% (etanercept in 40%). At 12 months, anti-TNF were effective in 67% (etanercept in 60%) and anakinra in 50% (no follow-up at 12 months is yet available for tocilizumab), RPDAI and ESR variation from baseline were the best indicators of efficacy at 12 months. Interestingly, RPDAI and steroid dose variation at 6 months were the best predictors of the outcome at 12 months.

Conclusion: Cytokine-targeted drugs are promising therapies for RP resistant to conventional therapy. Variations at 6 months in ESR levels and RPDAI score may be predictors of the long term efficacy of anti-TNF and anakinra.


Disclosure:

M. Baldini,
None;

P. Aiello,
None;

M. Tiraboschi,
None;

M. G. Sabbadini,
None;

E. Baldissera,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologic-therapy-for-relapsing-polychondritis-old-and-new-efficacy-indices/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology