ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2338

Biologic Switching Rates Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

L Rosenblatt1, F Lobo1, P Cockrum2, L Wang3, E Alemao2, O Baser4 and H Yuce5, 1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 3STATinMED Research, Dallas, TX, 4STATinMED Research and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 5New York City College of Technology (CUNY), Brooklyn, NJ

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: abatacept and anti-TNF therapy, Medicare

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Treatment guidelines for the management of RA recommend sequential use of biologic therapies, and the majority of patients switch from one anti-TNF agent to another. Previous data from commercial claims databases have shown that patients on a second-line anti-TNF agent are more likely to switch biologic treatment than those on second-line abatacept, a biologic with a different mechanism of action.1 We assessed treatment switching in a Medicare population of patients with RA, who had received a first- or second-line biologic DMARD (bDMARD; abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab). Methods: A retrospective, observational analysis using Medicare claims data (January 2006–December 2010) was conducted in patients with RA newly initiated on a bDMARD (first-line cohort). Further analysis in a subgroup compared first-line anti-TNF patients who switched to another anti-TNF (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab) with first-line anti-TNF patients who switched to abatacept (second-line cohort). Patients in the first- and second-line cohorts were required to have a minimum of 6-month pre-index, and 12-month post-index, eligibility. Patients were defined as switchers if they had a claim for a new bDMARD within 200% days’ supply of the last claim for index bDMARD during the post-index period. Switch rates in first- and second-line cohorts were determined. Patients who discontinued index bDMARD (and did not switch) in the post-index period were excluded from the analyses. Logistic regression determined the odds of switching for patients on abatacept compared with those on anti-TNFs, while controlling for covariates. Results: Of the 18,148 first-line bDMARD patients with RA included in the analyses (81.5% anti-TNF and 18.5% abatacept), switch rates were 11.7% and 10.6% for those taking anti-TNFs and abatacept, respectively (p=0.0174). For the second-line analyses, 777 bDMARD patients were included (45.4% anti-TNF and 54.6% abatacept). Subsequent switch to a third bDMARD occurred in 12.7% of those who had previously switched to abatacept and 28.6% of those who had previously switched to an anti-TNF (p<0.001). Logistic regression demonstrated that, after adjusting for covariates, patients who switched to abatacept had significantly lower odds of switching again than anti-TNF switchers (odds ratio=0.33, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.51).  

  Total, n (%) Switchers, n (%)
First-line analysis (n=18,148)    
Anti-TNF 14,794 (81.5) 1728 (11.7)
Abatacept 3354 (18.5) 357 (10.6)
Second-line analysis (n=777)    
Anti-TNF to anti-TNF 353 (45.4) 101 (28.6)
Anti-TNF to abatacept 424 (54.6) 54 (12.7)
  Conclusion: In a Medicare population, patients with RA who switch between anti-TNFs have significantly higher rates of subsequent bDMARD switch compared with those who switch from an anti-TNF to abatacept. It is hypothesized that treatment pathways that include switching to a different class of bDMARD may reduce subsequent overall bDMARD switch rates and therefore reduce costs in the management of patients with RA.   Reference 1. Meissner B, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63(Suppl 10): 2198.

Disclosure:

L. Rosenblatt,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

1,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

3;

F. Lobo,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

3;

P. Cockrum,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

1,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

3;

L. Wang,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

5;

E. Alemao,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

3;

O. Baser,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

5;

H. Yuce,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologic-switching-rates-among-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology