ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 637

Biologic Initiation Patterns Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Moderate or High Disease Activity While Using Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

Natalie Boytsov1, George W. Reed2, Leslie R Harrold2,3, Xiang Zhang1, Carol L Gaich1, Cynthia J Larmore1, Ying Shan2, S Rebello4 and Andre B. Araujo1, 1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 2Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, 3UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, 4Epidemiology, Corrona, Southborough, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

 

Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe biologic initiation patterns over a 1-year follow-up period in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate or high disease activity (M/HDA) while on conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs).

Methods: Biologic-naïve RA patients on cDMARD were selected in a US national observational cohort (Corrona RA registry) between 1/1/2006 and 1/31/2016. All patients selected were in M/HDA based on the Clinical Disease Activity index (CDAI >10) and had ≥ 1 year of follow-up and no change in the treatment during 3 months prior to the index date. Index date was the earliest visit the patient met the inclusion criteria. Patients were excluded if their age of RA onset was <18y, or they were exposed to biologics prior to the index date. Patients’ demographics, RA disease characteristics, and biologic initiation patterns were described. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared, using descriptive statistics, between patients who initiated a biologic during the follow-up vs. those who did not.

Results: Out of 11874 cDMARD users in Corrona, 3345 (28%) were in M/HDA and 2217 (19%) met the study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most patients were female (78%), white (88%) and 64 years of age on average [SD=12]. The mean duration of RA was about 11 years [SD=10] with mean CDAI score of 20 [SD=10] at the index date. About a quarter (n=537) of the patients initiated a biologic, on average, 4 months [SD=3] after the index date. Of biologic initiators, most (85%) received a TNF-inhibitor as their first biologic. There were significant differences between the biologic initiators and non-initiators in baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (Table 1). The initiators were younger, had shorter duration of RA, had fewer comorbidities, but had higher CDAI scores and a higher proportion reported morning joint stiffness. Other RA disease baseline characteristics indicated more severe RA for the initiator group (Table 1). Most (92%) of these patients had M/HDA at the time of the biologic initiation. Among those who did not initiate a biologic, two-thirds remained on their index cDMARD therapy. Of the non-initiators, 11% had unknown disease activity status during the follow-up; among those who had disease activity reported, 53% had achieved LDA and 16% had achieved remission on at least 1 visit during the follow-up; 32% remained in M/HDA.  

Conclusion: A minority (24%) of cDMARD users in M/HDA initiated a biologic therapy during the 1 year follow-up. Factors associated with biologic initiation were younger age, shorter duration of RA, less cancer and cardiovascular disease, more severe RA at baseline and higher disease activity during the follow-up.

 


Disclosure: N. Boytsov, None; G. W. Reed, Corrona, LLC, 3; L. R. Harrold, None; X. Zhang, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; C. L. Gaich, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; C. J. Larmore, Eli Lilly and Company, 1; Y. Shan, Corrona, LLC, 3; S. Rebello, Corrona, LLC, 3; A. B. Araujo, Eli Lilly and Company, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Boytsov N, Reed GW, Harrold LR, Zhang X, Gaich CL, Larmore CJ, Shan Y, Rebello S, Araujo AB. Biologic Initiation Patterns Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Moderate or High Disease Activity While Using Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologic-initiation-patterns-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-in-moderate-or-high-disease-activity-while-using-conventional-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biologic-initiation-patterns-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-in-moderate-or-high-disease-activity-while-using-conventional-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology