ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2511

Benepali Switches in Clinical Practice – a Positive Single Centre Experience

Hoda Alkoky, Angela Pakozdi and Hasan Tahir, Rheumatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biosimilars and etanercept

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster III: Biosimilars and New Compounds

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Benepali (SB4) an etanercept (ETN) biosimilar, has demonstrated comparable efficacy in randomised controlled trials. Switching patients to biosimilars has cost benefits to the national health systems (NHS). However, there is reluctance to switch patients, due to lack of real world data about its efficacy and safety.

The impetus for this study was to determine the real data trends of efficacy and safety in SB4 switching during treatment of patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: Inflammatory arthritis patients, (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AS)) switching from ETN to SB4, between Mar/17 and Oct/17, were included in this prospective observational single centre study. Disease activity scores and CRP before, and 3-6 months after switch, were calculated. Factors associated with SB4 withdrawal were recorded. DAS28, spinal VAS, BASDAI, and 66/68 swollen joint (SJ) and tender joint (TJ) counts were captured to measure efficacy. Flares were defined as a change of 1.2 points in DAS28, whilst a change of 22.55% in BASDAI was considered clinically significant.

Results:

A total of 158 inflammatory arthritis SB4 switch patients were identified (87 RA, 30 PsA and 41 AS). Patients switched from ETN after a median time of 67 (RA), 110 (PsA) and 51 (AS) months. Demographics are shown in Table 1. Disease activity measurements before, and 3-6 months after switch, are shown in Table 2. In RA, no statistical difference was found in mean DAS28 scores (p=0.344). In PsA, no significant difference was found in 68 TJ counts (p=0.565) and 66 SJ counts (p=0.475). In AS, there was no difference in mean BASDAI (p=0.893) or VAS scores (p=0.108). Median CRP level was comparable in the three groups (p=0.363). 144 (91.14%) patients continued to receive SB4 at six months. In total, 14 patients (8.9%) switched back to ETN from SB4: 4 AS (2.5%) patients had disease flare. 7 patients (4.4%) had mild adverse reaction (pruritus (2), rash (1), dizziness (1), bruising (2) and blurred vision (1)), and 3 RA patients (1.9%) had a subjective deterioration with unchanged DAS 28. All 14 patients achieved improvement after switching back to ETN.

Table 1. Baseline demographics of Barts patient cohort

RA (n=87)

PsA (n=30)

AS (n=41)

Age (mean ± SD)

61.68 ± 13.61

54.77 ± 13.54

41.90 ± 9.80

Female gender, n (%)

70 (80.5%)

12 (29.3%)

7 (23.3%)

Duration of ETN (months), median [IQR]

67 [38.75-115]

110 [85-115]

51 [20.5-86.0]

Other biologic drug prior to ETN, n (%)

6 (6.9%)

1 (2.4%)

3 (10%)

ETN indicates etanercept; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; AS, axial spondyloarthritis

Table 2. Disease activity scores before and 3-6 months after switch

ETN (mean ± SD)

SB4 (mean ± SD)

p-value

DAS28

2.82 ± 1.49

3.03 ± 1.47

0.344

BASDAI

3.27 ± 2.59

3.32 ± 2.24

0.893

Spinal VAS

3.22 ± 2.95

4.12 ± 2.99

0.108

68 TJC

4.26 ± 10.55

3.81 ± 9.76

0.565

66 SJC

0.78 ± 1.97

0.93 ± 1.64

0.475

ETN indicates etanercept; SB4, benepali

Conclusion:

In this real-life observational study, biosimilar switch of SB4 was successful in over 90% of cases. The efficacy of SB4 seemed comparable to ETN and was well tolerated. In this cohort, the switch to SB4 resulted in an approximate cost saving of £370,000/yr to the NHS. It is hoped these results will encourage other centers to switch their patients from originator ETN to biosimilar SB4.


Disclosure: H. Alkoky, None; A. Pakozdi, None; H. Tahir, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Alkoky H, Pakozdi A, Tahir H. Benepali Switches in Clinical Practice – a Positive Single Centre Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/benepali-switches-in-clinical-practice-a-positive-single-centre-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/benepali-switches-in-clinical-practice-a-positive-single-centre-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology