ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1341

Beneficial Effect of Anti-TNF Therapy in the Lipoprotein Atherogenic Risk Profile in Comparison with DMARD Standard Therapy in RA Patients

Jaime Calvo-Alen1, Ignacio Villa2, Victor M. Martinez-Taboada3, Jose Luis Peña-Sagredo4, Mario Agudo4, Ana Carmen García5 and Juan Gomez-Gerique6, 1Rheumatology, Hospital de Sierrallana. Torrelavega. Spain, Torrelavega, Spain, 2Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain, 3Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla. IFIMAV, Santander, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IFIMAV, Santander, Spain, 5Fundación 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, 6Laboratorio de metabolismo lípidico y riesgo vascular, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: RA patients portend a greater risk of cardio-vascular complications than general population. Although most probably diverse mechanisms are implicated, quantity and quality changes in the lipoproteins appear to have an important role.

Methods: RA patients in stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy at least during the last six months and a matched (by age, gender and rheumatoid factor status) with stable doses of standard DMARDs (most of them using methotrexate) were clinically evaluated using DAS28, as activity marker and MHAQ to assess disability. In addition, a complete standard lipid profile, a comprehensive lipoprotein assessment was carried out including: Lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and B ( ApoB) levels (total and lipoprotein specific), levels of paroxonase 1 (PON1), HDL, LDL, VLDL and total cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids levels as well as number of molecules of these lipids  (mc, mt and mf respectively) in each lipoprotein, total mass  (M) and number of particles (np) of the before mentioned lipoproteins, levels of PCSK9 receptor. Results of both subsets of patients were performed with standard statistical tests.

Results: 

Sixty-seven RA patients on anti-TNF and 63 matched RA patients on DMARD, mean age (58.7±12.3 and 61±12.1 years), gender distribution (81% females in both cases), disease duration (140±165 and 143±276 months) and RF status (64% in both cases) were comparable. Patients on DMARD were more active (DAS28 4.42±1.35 vs 3.57± 1.27 and hsCRP 9.4±15.2 vs 3.8±5.8 mg/l respectively. Main findings in the lipoprotein analysis are shown in table 1:

 

Apo-A (mg/dl)

MVLDL (mg/dl)

np VLDL

Anti-TNF

169.7

913.5

89513.1

DMARD

156.2

1360.8

112898.3

p value

.008

.001

.017

Multivariate analysis were performed with the three variables entering DAS28 as covariate and in all cases anti-TNF therapy remained as unique explicative variable.

Conclusion:

RA patients treated with anti-TNF, regardless that they show lower levels of clinical activity, they have an improvement in their atherogenic risk profile showing higher levels of ApoA1 and therefore greater antioxidant capacity as well as lower levels of total mass and number of particles of VLDL which are atherogenic risk factors.


Disclosure:

J. Calvo-Alen,
None;

I. Villa,
None;

V. M. Martinez-Taboada,
None;

J. L. Peña-Sagredo,
None;

M. Agudo,
None;

A. C. García,
None;

J. Gomez-Gerique,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/beneficial-effect-of-anti-tnf-therapy-in-the-lipoprotein-atherogenic-risk-profile-in-comparison-with-dmard-standard-therapy-in-ra-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology