ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 743

Behavior of Complement Levels and Risk of Organ Involvement in SLE Patients

Ignacio Javier Gandino1, Marina Scolnik1, Emmanuel Bertiller1, Valeria Scaglioni2 and Enrique R. Soriano3, 1Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, and Fundacion PM Catoggio, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Rheumatology, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Internal Medicine, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: complement and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: the complement system plays a major role in autoimmune diseases, and in particular in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Complement deficiencies are a genetic risk factor for SLE. Also a reduction in complement levels has been associated with an increase in SLE activity, with certain organ involvement (ie glomerulonephritis) and as a predictor of a SLE flare. Our objective was to analyze clinical course of SLE patients with permanent low complement levels, and compare them with those with fluctuant levels or persistently normal levels.

Methods: complement determinations (C3 and C4 levels) were analyzed in patients with SLE (fulfilling ACR or SLICC criteria) seen at a University hospital between 2000 and 2013. Patients were grouped in those with permanent C3 and/or C4 low values (low complement group) those with C3 and C4 constant normal values (normal complement group), and those with fluctuant values (periods of normal and periods of low values, during follow up: fluctuant group). Mortality, clinical characteristics, organ involvement and antibodies were analyzed and compared between groups.

Results: Two hundred and seventy SLE patients were included (242 females, 89.6%), mean age at diagnosis was 34.2 years (SD 15.8). Patients were divided according to complement levels during follow up in 3 groups: persistent low complement levels (n=79), normal complement levels (n=116), and fluctuant levels (n=75). Demographics, clinical and serological characteristics are shown in table 1. Mortality was similar between the three groups (5%, 4% and 7%, respectively).  Lupus glomerulonephritis was more frequent in patients with fluctuant levels of complement (both proliferative and membranous glomerulonephritis). Patients with normal complement had less frequency of hematological involvement and antiDNA antibodies. On multivariable analysis persistent low complement levels were neither associated with mortality nor with organ damage as measured by SLICC (SLICC>0). Only increased age was associated with mortality, and increased age and neurologic involvement with SLICC >0. 

Conclusion: Different behavior of complement levels in SLE patients was not associated with differences in outcomes (mortality and organ damage). Although there were some differences in organ involvement (higher prevalence of glomerulonephritis in fluctuant levels group, and hematological involvement and anti DNA antibodies in low and fluctuant levels groups), do not appear to represent clear different sub-groups of patients. 

Table 1. SLE patients grouped by behavior of complement levels during follow up.

 

Normal complement

(n=116)

Persistent Low complement

(n=79)

Fluctuant complement

(n=75)

P value

Females, n (%)

107 (92.2)

70 (88.6)

65 (86.7)

0.439

Age at diagnosis, average, years (SD)

36.4 (16.5)

32.4 (14.7)

32.7 (15.8)

0.1397

Follow-up, median, years (IQR)

6.4 (8.2)

6.1 (7.6)

9.2 (5.6)

0.345

Fulfilling ACR criteria, n (%)

 

76 (65.5)#

64 (81)*

66 (88)&

0.001  * and & vs #

Fulfilling SLICC criteria, n (%)

 

96 (82.7)#

73 (92.4)

74 (98.7)&

0.001  & vs #

Cutaneous Lupus, n (%)

76 (65.5)

50 (63.3)

44 (58.7)

0.773

Oral ulcers, n (%)

24 (20.7)

19 (24.1)

20 (26.7)

0.624

Serositis, n (%)

37 (31.9)

15 (18.9)

17 (22.7)

0.102

Artritis, n (%)

59 (50.9)

47 (59.5)

35 (46.7)

0.261

Neurologic, n (%)

 

15 (12.9)

7 (8.9)

7 (9.3)

0.598

Renal, n (%)

57 (49)#

44 (56)*

56 (75)&

0.002 & vs # and *

Leukopenia or lymphopenia, n (%)

35 (30.2)#

39 (49.4)*

34 (45.3)&

0.007  * vs # and 0.033 & vs #

Thrombocytopenia

20 (17.2)#

28 (35.4)*

25 (33.3)&

0.026  * and & vs #

ANA positive, n (%)

109 (94)

77 (97.5)

68 (90.7)

0.202

DNA positive, n (%)

52 (44.8)#

54(68.3)*

57 (76)&

<0.001 * and & vs #

Sm positive, n (%)

12 (10.3)

10 (12.7)

8 (10.7)

0.882

Lupus anticoagulant positive, n (%)

14 (12.1)

16 (20.2)

11 (14.7)

0.254

Anticardiolipins positive, n (%)

17 (14.7)

20 (25.3)

13 (17.3)

0.405

SLICC at the end of follow up, mean (SD)

0.98 (1.4)

1 (1.4)

1.33 (1.7)

0.2345


Disclosure: I. J. Gandino, None; M. Scolnik, None; E. Bertiller, None; V. Scaglioni, None; E. R. Soriano, Abbvie; Janssen; UCB; Roche; Bristol Myers Squibb, 2,Abbvie; UCB; Janssen; Roche; Bristol Myers Squibb; Pfizer; Novartis, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gandino IJ, Scolnik M, Bertiller E, Scaglioni V, Soriano ER. Behavior of Complement Levels and Risk of Organ Involvement in SLE Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/behavior-of-complement-levels-and-risk-of-organ-involvement-in-sle-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/behavior-of-complement-levels-and-risk-of-organ-involvement-in-sle-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology