ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0460

Baseline Glucocorticoid Toxicity in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the GiACTA Trial

Naomi Patel1, Xiaoqing Fu2, yuqing zhang3 and John Stone4, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Sale Creek, TN, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Quincy, MA, 4Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Unit, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, glucocorticoids, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated and Related Disorders Poster I: Giant Cell Arteritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) requires treatment with high-dose, long-term glucocorticoids (GCs). The development of future GC toxicities may be predicted by baseline toxicities. Thus, a baseline GC toxicity score can serve as an important covariate in analyses and play an essential role in risk stratification for patients initiating GCs and potential GC-sparing therapies. However, baseline GC toxicity has not been assessed systematically in rheumatic disease patients thus far.

Methods: We analyzed GCA patients enrolled in the GiACTA (Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis) trial. The screening period for GiACTA was up to 42 days, during which time patients were treated with GCs as necessary to control their GCA. Baseline GC toxicity scores for different domains were calculated from the medical history, laboratory values, vital signs, and medications. Weights for the items within domains were derived from the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI), which includes 9 domains: Body Mass Index, Glucose Tolerance, Blood Pressure, Lipid Metabolism, Bone/Tendon, Glucocorticoid Myopathy, Skin, Neuropsychiatric, and Infection, as well as 3 additional damage domains: Ocular, Gastrointestinal, and Endocrine (Table 1). The overall baseline GC toxicity scores ranged potentially from 0 to 538, with higher scores indicating greater toxicity. We calculated the breakdown of scores within each domain and assessed the contributions of each domain score to the overall score by evaluating the sum total of scores within each domain divided by the sum total of all overall scores. We used a t-test to compare differences in overall baseline GC toxicity scores and Mantel-Haenszel Chi-squared test to evaluate differences in baseline GC toxicity domain scores between those with newly-diagnosed versus relapsing disease at baseline.

Results: A total of 250 patients were included (75% females, mean age 69 years). The mean ± SD baseline GC toxicity score among all patients was 111.3 ± 53.2. The domains that contributed most to the overall scores were the Blood Pressure domain (24.0% of the overall score), followed by Glucose Tolerance (22.6%), and then Neuropsychiatric (15.9%). Baseline GC toxicity scores were higher in patients with relapsing disease compared with those with newly-diagnosed disease (mean of 122.5 vs. 98.9, P< 0.001) (Table 2; Figure). The Body Mass Index and Neuropsychiatric domain scores were significantly higher in those with relapsing disease.

Conclusion: The Blood Pressure and Glucose Tolerance domains contributed most significantly to baseline GC toxicity scores in patients with GCA. Baseline GC toxicity scores were significantly higher in patients with relapsing as opposed to newly-diagnosed disease. Baseline GC toxicity scores may have important implications for risk-stratification in patients starting GC therapy.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Components of baseline GC toxicity scores and the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index.

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Differences in baseline glucocorticoid toxicity scores between those with newly-diagnosed versus relapsing disease at baseline.

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. Histogram of baseline glucocorticoid toxicity scores in all patients as well as those with newly-diagnosed versus relapsing disease at baseline.
A. Distribution of baseline GC toxicity scores in all patients. B. Distribution of baseline GC toxicity scores in patients with newly-diagnosed versus relapsing disease. Purple represents overlap in the percentages of newly-diagnosed and relapsing patients. Red represents excess percentage of newly-diagnosed patients over those with relapsing disease. Blue represents excess percentage of patients with relapsing disease over those with newly-diagnosed disease.
GC, glucocorticoid


Disclosures: N. Patel, FVC Health; X. Fu, None; y. zhang, None; J. Stone, Horizon Theraputics, Sanofi, Amgen, Argenx, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Chemocentryx, Kyverna, Novartis, Palleon Pharmaceuticals, PPD, Q32, Star Therapeutics, Roche, Mirabio, Spruce Biosciences, Steritas, Zenas.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Patel N, Fu X, zhang y, Stone J. Baseline Glucocorticoid Toxicity in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of the GiACTA Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baseline-glucocorticoid-toxicity-in-the-treatment-of-giant-cell-arteritis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-the-giacta-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baseline-glucocorticoid-toxicity-in-the-treatment-of-giant-cell-arteritis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-the-giacta-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology