ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1832

Barriers to Medication Adherence and Degree of Nonadherence in a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outpatient Population

Courtney Hardy1, Dafna Gladman2, Jiandong Su3, Nathalie Rozenbojm4 and Murray Urowitz5, 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3University of Toronto Lupus Clinic, Centre for Prognosis Studies in Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: health behaviors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: It has been reported that 50% to 75% of patients with SLE do not adhere to their medications. However, the reasons for nonadherence are not clear. We aimed to estimate the level of medication adherence and barriers to adherence among patients attending the Lupus Clinic.

Methods: Patients taking at least one medication to treat SLE including antimalarials, immunosuppressives, or steroids were included. All patients satisfied the ACR classification criteria for SLE. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI). Patients were defined as nonadherent with adherence rates < 80% or sufficiently adherent with adherence rates ≥ 80%, based on the MASRI visual analog scale (VAS). Pill counts were conducted in a proportion of participants. Barriers to medication adherence were identified using the Identification of Medication Adherence Barriers Questionnaire (IMAB-Q).

Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: A total of 94 patients were recruited to the study and 28 pill counts were conducted. Ten patients were classified as nonadherent and 84 patients as sufficiently adherent. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of demographics. The mean age of participants was 46.6 years, female: male ratio was approximately 9:1, mean disease duration was 18.0 years, mean SLEDAI score was 3.1, and mean SLICC score was 1.6. Forty-five percent of patients were taking steroid, 77.7% antimalarial, and 55.3% immunosuppressive medications. Eighty-eight percent of patients were taking at least one medication for non-SLE conditions (Table 1).

The mean medication adherence rate for the SLE patients was 90.7%, based on the MASRI VAS. Adherence rates were corroborated by pill counts. Important barriers to medication adherence reported by nonadherent patients were: concern about harmful medication side effects (50%), being easily distracted from taking medications as prescribed (50%), life getting in the way of taking medications as prescribed (50%), being unsure or disagreeing that their condition will worsen without taking medications as prescribed (50%), and having personal reasons for not taking medications as prescribed (50%). Patients defined as nonadherent reported significantly more barriers to medication adherence than patients defined as sufficiently adherent, based on IMAB-Q total scores (p < 0.001). Specific barriers to medication adherence that were experienced by nonadherent participants significantly more often (p < 0.001), included: being easily distracted from taking medications as prescribed, remembering to take medications as prescribed, having system(s) in place to help manage medications, taking medications as prescribed not fitting in their daily routine, not prioritizing or having the intention to take medications as prescribed, and having personal reasons for not taking medications as prescribed (Table 2).

Conclusion: The adherence rate in our population was higher than expected, reaching 90% on the MASRI, confirmed by pill count. A number of barriers to medication adherence were identified. These barriers to medication adherence need to be addressed on an individualized basis to improve patient outcomes.

Table 1. Patient and Disease Characteristics

Table 2. Barriers to Adherence


Disclosure: C. Hardy, None; D. Gladman, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Gilead, 5, Galapagos, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5; J. Su, None; N. Rozenbojm, None; M. Urowitz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hardy C, Gladman D, Su J, Rozenbojm N, Urowitz M. Barriers to Medication Adherence and Degree of Nonadherence in a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Outpatient Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-to-medication-adherence-and-degree-of-nonadherence-in-a-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-outpatient-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-to-medication-adherence-and-degree-of-nonadherence-in-a-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-outpatient-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology