ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2101

Barriers To Improving Physical Activity In Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Activity and Nutrition Trial In Lupus To Energize and Renew (ANTLER) Pilot Study

Linda S. Ehrlich-Jones1, Grace E. Ahn2, Christine Pellegrini3 and Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman4, 1Research CROR, Rehabilitation Institute Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2Rheumatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 3Center for Behavioral Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 4Medicine/Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus and physical activity

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: ARHP Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation Sciences

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Current literature indicates that exercise is safe and effective in improving fatigue, depression, aerobic capacity, and health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Only 28% of SLE patients self-report that they meet the US government public health goal of at least 150 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (PA). Some barriers to PA for patients with SLE include fatigue, exposure to sunlight, pain, depression, sleep disturbance and hematologic and bony abnormalities predisposing to bleeding and fracture. We assessed barriers to PA as well as goals to improving PA before and after a behavioral intervention in a group of patients with SLE.

Methods: In a mixed-methods pilot study of 8 SLE adults, we identified barriers to increasing their PA using the Arthritis Comprehensive Treatment Assessment. In addition, we identified goals they would like to achieve over the next 6 weeks to increase their PA. All participants completed the Motives for Physical Activity Measure-Revised (MPAM-R), a questionnaire to assess the strength of five motives for participating in PA, at baseline and completion of the study. Individual coaching sessions were held at baseline and 6 weeks with a healthy lifestyle coach (exercise physiologist or occupational therapist) to review their barriers to PA and the achievement of their goals at the end of the study.  Participants were also offered 3 group educational sessions highlighting PA, healthy nutrition and motivation to behavior change.

Results: The sample consisted of 6 women and 2 men, mean age 47 years (SD=7.75) and included 50% African-American, Asian and Caucasian (25% each). Sixty-two percent were married. At baseline, 8 participants participated in an individual coaching session; 7 completed the 3 group educational sessions and the individual session at the end of the study. At the baseline visit, 6 participants identified feeling tired or washed out, 5 identified motivation and 4 identified pain as barriers to doing PA. PA goals included: going to the gym (treadmill, elliptical, swimming and strength training), doing yoga or Zumba classes. Post-intervention, 4 participants stated an increase in their level of satisfaction with their PA. Fatigue, pain and motivation continued to be barriers to increasing PA. Mean MPAM-R subscale change scores for enjoyment (4.01), social (2.18), and appearance (1.56), all increased post-intervention, while change scores for competence (-0.48) and fitness (-0.57) remained relatively the same.

Conclusion: Fatigue, pain and motivation appear to be the most common barriers to increasing PA in this pilot study. Enjoyment, appearance and social motives for PA appeared to increase post intervention. A larger clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.


Disclosure:

L. S. Ehrlich-Jones,
None;

G. E. Ahn,
None;

C. Pellegrini,
None;

R. Ramsey-Goldman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-to-improving-physical-activity-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-the-activity-and-nutrition-trial-in-lupus-to-energize-and-renew-antler-pilot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology