ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1880

Baricitinib 4 Mg and 2 Mg Once Daily Reduced Pain in Both Patients Who Were Opioid Users and Non-users in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post-hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Trials

Janet Pope1, Yvonne Lee 2, Jeffrey Curtis 3, Daojun Mo 4, Terence Rooney 4, Li Xie 4, Christina Dickson 4, Douglas Schlichting 4, Amanda Quebe 4, Anabela Cardoso 4, Lee Simon 5 and Peter Taylor 6, 1Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 5SDG LLC, Cambridge, MA, 6University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, baricitinib, opioids, pain and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M115: Pain Mechanisms – Basic & Clinical Science (1878–1883)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Opioid use in RA patients has increased over the past 2 decades in the US. Little is known about the combined effects of opioids and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on pain in RA. To assess pain reduction in opioid users and non-users, we tested the effect of 1) 4 mg baricitinib (BARI), an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, vs. placebo (PBO) with data pooled from Phase 3 trials, RA-BEAM (NCT01710358, with RA patients with an inadequate response [IR] to MTX), RA-BUILD (NCT01721057, with those with IR to conventional DMARDs), and RA-BEACON (NCT01721044, with those with IR to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitors), 2) BARI 2 mg vs. PBO in RA-BEACON, and 3) subcutaneous 40 mg adalimumab (ADA) every other week vs. PBO in RA-BEAM.

Methods: Opioid users were patients who reported opioid use during the trials. The number of opioid users/the total number of randomized patients were: 171/891 BARI 4 mg and 153/892 PBO in the pooled analysis, 54/174 BARI 2 mg and 58/176 PBO in RA-BEACON, and 34/330 ADA and 50/488 PBO in RA-BEAM. Pain was measured by the Patient’s Assessment of Pain visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 mm). Last observation before treatment discontinuation or rescue was carried forward through Week 24. An ANCOVA model assessed differences in pain reduction at each time point between BARI 4 mg and PBO (pooled), BARI 2 mg and PBO (RA-BEACON), and ADA and PBO (RA-BEAM) by opioid users and non-users. Baseline pain VAS, age, BMI, and trial were covariates in the model. Heterogeneity of treatment effect (active vs. PBO) was evaluated across opioid users and non-users by interaction test. Analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity.

Results: BARI 4 mg had greater pain reduction vs. PBO in opioid users and non-users (P< 0.05) at all time points (Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24). Pain reduction in BARI 4 mg vs. PBO was similar between opioid users and non-users at all time points (interaction P >0.1 at all time points). At Week 24, the difference in pain VAS reduction between BARI 4 mg vs. PBO was -13.4 mm (95% CI: -19.0, -7.8) in opioid users and -14.3 mm (-16.7, -11.9) in non-users, interaction P=0.8. In RA-BEACON, BARI 2 mg had greater pain reduction vs. PBO in both opioid users and non-users (P< 0.05) starting at Week 12. Pain reduction with BARI 2 mg vs. PBO was similar between opioid users and non-users at all time points (interaction P >0.1 at all time points). At Week 24, the difference in pain VAS reduction between BARI 2 mg vs. PBO was -10.7 mm (-19.5, -1.9) in opioid users and -8.3 mm (-15.0, -1.6) in non-users, interaction P=0.8. In RA-BEAM, a significant difference in pain reduction was not observed for ADA vs. PBO in the opioid users; whereas, for non-users, a difference in pain reduction was observed for ADA vs. PBO at all time points (P< 0.05). At Week 24, the difference in pain VAS reduction between ADA vs. PBO was -4.9 mm (95% CI:-16.4, 6.6) in opioid users and -12.2 mm (-15.6, -8.9) in non-users, interaction P=0.2.

Conclusion: Pain reduction with BARI 4 mg was similar between opioid users and non-users and was observed at all time points. Pain reduction with BARI 2 mg vs. PBO was similar between opioid users and non-users from Week 12.  In contrast, ADA did not result in pain reduction compared to PBO in opioid users.


Disclosure: J. Pope, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Actelion, 5, Actellion, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Astra-Zeneca, 2, Bayer, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eicos Sciences, 5, Eli Lilly & Company, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, EMERALD, 5, Emerald, 5, Genzyme, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Seattle Genetics, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 8; Y. Lee, Cigna Corp, 1, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, Express Scripts, 4, Pfizer, 2; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Eli Lilly & Company, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Myriad, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; D. Mo, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; T. Rooney, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; L. Xie, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; C. Dickson, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; D. Schlichting, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Quebe, Eli Lilly & Company, 3, 4, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Cardoso, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; L. Simon, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, NuvoResearch, 5, Roche, 5, Pfizer, 5, Bayer, 5, Regeneron, 5, Gilead, 5; P. Taylor, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Biogen, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Fresenius, 5, Fresenius SE & Co, 5, Fresnius, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Nordic Pharma, 5, NORDIC Pharma, 5, Pfizer, 5, Pfizer Inc, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pope J, Lee Y, Curtis J, Mo D, Rooney T, Xie L, Dickson C, Schlichting D, Quebe A, Cardoso A, Simon L, Taylor P. Baricitinib 4 Mg and 2 Mg Once Daily Reduced Pain in Both Patients Who Were Opioid Users and Non-users in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post-hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baricitinib-4-mg-and-2-mg-once-daily-reduced-pain-in-both-patients-who-were-opioid-users-and-non-users-in-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-phase-3-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/baricitinib-4-mg-and-2-mg-once-daily-reduced-pain-in-both-patients-who-were-opioid-users-and-non-users-in-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-post-hoc-analysis-of-phase-3-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology