ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1392

Azathioprine May be an Effective Steroid Sparing Agent in Patients with Isolated Recurrent Pericarditis

Adam Brown1, Xiaobo Liu2 and Soumya Chatterjee3, 1Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 2Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 3Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: DMARDs and azathioprine

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases Poster Session II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Isolated Recurrent pericarditis (IRP) is a disease with high morbidity. IRP refers to recurrent pericarditis not associated with an autoimmune rheumatic disease or cardiac surgery/injury. Conventional therapy for IRP is a combination of NSAIDs, colchicine and Glucocorticoids (GC) termed triple therapy. A major cause of morbidity in these patients is the predictable side effects of prolonged GC therapy to prevent and treat flares. There is some evidence to support the use of azathioprine (AZA) as an immunomodulating agent in this setting.1The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether AZA can be used as an effective steroid sparing agent in IRP. This goal was achieved by evaluating the average and cumulative GC requirement over 6 months before and after initiation of AZA in patients with IRP. 

Methods:

To be eligible for the study patients had to be followed for at least 6 months after initiating AZA and had to have at least 2 recurrences of IRP prior to initiation of AZA. After evaluating all patients with IRP, 13 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Patients’ charts were reviewed to determine the total dose of GC required in 2 week intervals over the course of 6 months. Each IRP flare (as defined by the cardiologist) was also documented. Since the onset of action of AZA is thought to be 2-3 months, the number of flares after starting AZA was documented between months 3 and 6. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for statistical analysis. All tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05. 

Results:

Twenty-eight patients were excluded because of evidence of systemic rheumatic disease or prior immunomodulator therapy. Out of 13 IRP cases, 10 were considered idiopathic or post viral and 3 were post myocardial injury. IRP patients had an average disease duration of 17 months prior to the initiation of AZA and all had at least 5 months of continuous prednisone use prior to initiation of AZA (12 patients had prednisone for >6 months). The mean daily dose of prednisone prior to AZA was 21 mg, and cumulative dose was 4,004 mg over 6 months. The mean daily dose of prednisone post AZA was 13 mg (p= 0.003), and cumulative dose was 2,229 mg (p=0.012) over 6 months. The average number of flares while on triple therapy in the 6 months prior to AZA was 3, and number of flares between months 3 and 6 of AZA therapy was 0.3 (p=0.001). The average dose of AZA was 1.8 mg/kg. Three patients were not able to lower their prednisone dose after AZA initiation and 2 of these patients were on < 1.5 mg/kg of AZA/day. 

Conclusion:

This is the first retrospective study that evaluated the average and cumulative dose requirement of GC in patients with IRP to maintain clinical remission before and after initiation of AZA. After the initiation of AZA, patients were able to have a significant reduction in the dose of GC required and had a significant reduction in the frequency of flares within a given time period.  In conclusion, this study suggests AZA is an effective steroid sparing agent in IRP. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

  1. Vianello F, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 17;147(3):477-8

Disclosure: A. Brown, None; X. Liu, None; S. Chatterjee, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Brown A, Liu X, Chatterjee S. Azathioprine May be an Effective Steroid Sparing Agent in Patients with Isolated Recurrent Pericarditis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/azathioprine-may-be-an-effective-steroid-sparing-agent-in-patients-with-isolated-recurrent-pericarditis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/azathioprine-may-be-an-effective-steroid-sparing-agent-in-patients-with-isolated-recurrent-pericarditis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology