ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 601

At Which Point and for Which Reasons Are Oral MTX Formulations Switched to Injectable Ones in RA Patients? Combined Results from 3 Independent Observational and Clinical Trials

René-Marc Flipo1, Alain Saraux2, Christophe Hudry3, Cécile Gaujoux-Viala4, Eric Senbel5, Sonia Tropé6, Elena Zinovieva7, Agnès Courbeyrette8 and Hélène Herman-Demars7, 1Hôpital Roger Salengro, Lille, France, 2Rheumatology, CHU Brest, Brest, France, 3AP-HP Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France, 4Rheumatology, Nîmes University Hospital and EA2415 Montpellier University, Nîmes, France, 5Rheumatology office, Marseille, France, 6149 avenue du Maine, ANDAR, Paris, France, 7Medical Department Nordic Pharma, Paris, France, 8Medical Departement, Nordic Pharma, Paris, France

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), oral, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment guidlelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster I: Strategy and Epidemiology

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

MTX is considered as a cornerstone in RA treatment since the 1990s and its injectable forms have proven their enhanced clinical and pharmacological efficacy and safety in case of insufficient response or poor tolerance of oral formulations. Few data are available considering the timepoint at which the formulation switch is performed in current practice.

The objective of this work was to investigate across 3 independent trials if there was a consistency in patterns of MTX oral -> injectable switches in terms of RA characteristics, MTX dosages (before and after the switch) and reasons of passage.

Methods:

Three trials were considered for this work: 1/ STRATEGE (observational study designed to investigate the therapeutic strategies used in current practice in RA patients insufficiently responding to initial MTX monotherapy), 2/ APRiM (observational study aimed to investigate the treatment adherence of RA patients switching from oral to injectable MTX or between two different MTX prefilled syringes) and 3/ SELFi (phase III randomized trial aiming to compare a new MTX autoinjector to the historical MTX prefilled syringe in terms of treatment adherence and functional capacity in RA patients at 6 months). In all three studies we selected baseline data concerning patients switching from oral to injectable MTX at the inclusion visit.

Results:

STRATEGE

N = 151

APRiM

N = 270

SELFi

N = 98

RA duration, years

(mean ± SD)

(median (min;max))

4.9 ± 6.1

2.8 (0.0; 29.0)

6.6 ± 8.1

3.0 (0.0; 40.0)

4.5 ± 5.9

2.0 (0.2; 30.5)

MTX treatment duration, years

(mean ± SD)

(median (min;max))

3.6 ± 4.5

1.9 (0.0; 24.3)

3.3 ± 4.2

1.4 (0.0; 23.6)

2.5 ± 2.8

1.4 (0.1; 15.4)

DAS28 (mean ± SD)

4.4 ± 0.9

3.9 ± 0.9

3.5 ± 1.2

MTX oral dosage at V0, mg/wk (mean ± SD)

15.3 ± 3.7

15.0 ± 4.1

14.8 ± 3.8

MTX injectable dosage at the end of V0, mg/wk (mean ± SD)

17.0 ± 4.0

16.3 ± 3.8

17.0 ± 4.0

Distribution MTX dosage unchanged / raised / reduced

50% / 45% / 5%

62% / 34% / 4%

51% / 42% / 7%

Consistent data were observed across the three considered trials concerning the oral/injectable MTX switch. It occurs after about 3 years of treatment, at a DAS28 of 4 and at an average dose of 15mg/wk (which is consistent with bioavailability data shown before). In most situations, MTX dosage is unchanged or very slightly raised at the switch timepoint. The main switch reasons were “non-achievement of treatment target” and “RA worsening”, the safety reasons were mentioned only in 5% of cases.

Conclusion: Our work showed a consistent pattern across 3 independent trials concerning the oral/injectable MTX switch. It generally occurs at 15mg/wk, the new injectable dosage being either unchanged or very slightly raised as compared to the last oral one. Surprisingly, the MTX route of administration seems to be modified mostly for efficacy reasons, safety issues being anecdotal.

Reference: Schiff MH et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014


Disclosure: R. M. Flipo, NordicPharma, 5; A. Saraux, Nordic Pharma, 5; C. Hudry, Nordic Pharma, 5; C. Gaujoux-Viala, NordicPharma, 5; E. Senbel, Nordic Pharma, 5; S. Tropé, Nordic Pharma, 6; E. Zinovieva, Nordic Pharma, 3; A. Courbeyrette, Nordic Pharma, 3; H. Herman-Demars, Nordic Pharma, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Flipo RM, Saraux A, Hudry C, Gaujoux-Viala C, Senbel E, Tropé S, Zinovieva E, Courbeyrette A, Herman-Demars H. At Which Point and for Which Reasons Are Oral MTX Formulations Switched to Injectable Ones in RA Patients? Combined Results from 3 Independent Observational and Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/at-which-point-and-for-which-reasons-are-oral-mtx-formulations-switched-to-injectable-ones-in-ra-patients-combined-results-from-3-independent-observational-and-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/at-which-point-and-for-which-reasons-are-oral-mtx-formulations-switched-to-injectable-ones-in-ra-patients-combined-results-from-3-independent-observational-and-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology