ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 792

Associations of Foot Structure and Function to Low Back and Lower Extremity Pain

Jody L. Riskowski1, Alyssa B. Dufour2, Thomas J. Hagedorn3, Howard J. Hillstrom4, Virginia A. Casey3 and Marian T. Hannan1, 1Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School & Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 3Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, 4Rehabilitation, Hospital Special Surgery (HSS), New York, NY

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Foot disorders and pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Foot and Gait Disorders

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Common risk factors of low back/lower extremity (LB/LE) joint pain are age, gender and body mass index (BMI), with women, older adults and overweight/obese individuals at increased risk. However, as foot motion during gait influences the movement pattern through the kinetic chain, foot structure and function may also be associated with lower extremity joint pain. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the relations of LB/LE pain to foot structure and function in a population-based study.

Methods:

Framingham Foot Study members with complete data on pain in the LB/LE joints as well as foot structure and function were included.

LB/LE joint pain was determined by the response to the NHANES-type question, “On most days do you have pain, aching or stiffness in your [low back, hips, knees, ankles, or feet]?” Bilateral and unilateral pain were weighted the same; responses were dichotomized to yes or no.

A pressure mat (Matscan, Tekscan Inc.) yielded foot structure and function data during bipedal standing, and while walking, using the two-step method. From these data, modified arch index (MAI), a measure of foot structure, and center of pressure excursion index (CPEI), a measure of foot function, were calculated.

Foot structure classification used MAI, with participants who had a foot in the top or bottom 20% of these values considered low arch or high arch, respectively, with the middle 60% the referent. Foot function classification used CPEI, with those who had a foot in the top or bottom 20% of these values denoted as supinators or pronators, respectively, with the middle 60% the referent.

Crude and adjusted (age, gender, BMI) logistic regression analysis (SAS, v. 9.3) determined associations of LB/LE pain to foot structure and function. Alpha was set to p≤0.05.

Results:

There were 1856 participants (age: 63.8 ± 8.9 years; BMI: 28.6 ± 5.6 kg/m2; 56% women). Of the sites assessed, low back pain was the most common at 34.1%, followed by knee pain at 29.4%; ankle pain was the least prevalent at 11.2% (Table 1).

Those with high arch foot structure had 26% lower odds of low back pain, whereas those with low arch structure had higher odds of knee (57%) and ankle (47%) pain. Supinated foot function during gait was associated with a 31% reduced odds of hip pain. After adjustment, odds ratios were attenuated and confidence intervals widened.

Conclusion:

A low arch structure, but not high arch structure or foot function, is associated with greater odds of lower extremity joint pain. The results suggest that differences in the kinetic chain may exist between those with high, low, and normal arch structure, and future studies should evaluate if differences in movement patterns are related to foot structure. Further, as this study is cross-sectional, longitudinal studies are needed to determine the cause-effect relations between foot structure and function to LB/LE pain.

Table 1: Crude and adjusted odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) of associations of lower extremity joint pain to foot structure, assessed using modified arch index (MAI), and to foot function, assessed using center of pressure excursion index (CPEI).

MAI – Crude Model

MAI – Crude Model

Region of Interest

N, % with Pain

Low Arch

High Arch

Low Arch

High Arch

Low Back

632, 34.1%

1.08 (0.85, 1.35)

0.74 (0.57, 0.95)

0.94 (0.74, 1.21)

0.80 (0.61, 1.03)

Hips

325, 17.5%

1.25 (0.94, 1.66)

0.98 (0.71, 1.34)

1.04 (0.83, 1.53)

1.12 (0.83, 1.53)

Knees

546, 29.4%

1.57 (1.24, 1.99)

0.86 (0.66, 1.13)

1.17 (0.91, 1.52)

1.05 (0.80, 1.39)

Ankles

207, 11.2%

1.47 (1.05, 2.06)

1.00 (0.68, 1.47)

1.14 (0.79, 1.64)

1.16 (0.78, 1.71)

Feet

487, 26.2%

1.22 (0.95, 1.56)

0.84 (0.64, 1.11)

1.04 (0.80, 1.35)

0.92 (0.70, 1.22)

CPEI – Crude Model

CPEI – Adjusted Model*

Region of Interest

N, % with Pain

Pronators

Supinators

Pronators

Supinators

Low Back

632, 34.1%

1.20 (0.96, 1.51)

0.91 (0.72, 1.16)

1.19 (0.94, 1.49)

0.98 (0.77, 1.25)

Hips

325, 17.5%

0.82 (0.62, 1.08)

0.69 (0.51, 0.93)

0.76 (0.57, 1.02)

0.78 (0.57, 1.05)

Knees

546, 29.4%

0.92 (0.72, 1.16)

0.90 (0.70, 1.14)

0.94 (0.73, 1.20)

0.97 (0.75, 1.26)

Ankles

207, 11.2%

0.86 (0.61, 1.22)

0.92 (0.65, 1.30)

0.86 (0.61, 1.23)

0.99 (0.69, 1.42)

Feet        

487, 26.2%

1.10 (0.87, 1.41)

0.89 (0.69, 1.15)

1.08 (0.84, 1.39)

0.97 (0.74, 1.26)

* Model adjusted by age, gender, body mass index


Disclosure:

J. L. Riskowski,
None;

A. B. Dufour,
None;

T. J. Hagedorn,
None;

H. J. Hillstrom,
None;

V. A. Casey,
None;

M. T. Hannan,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/associations-of-foot-structure-and-function-to-low-back-and-lower-extremity-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology