ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2633

Association of Medication Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence in a Diverse Cohort of Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Caroline McCulley1, Patricia P. Katz2, Laura Trupin2, Edward H. Yelin3 and Jennifer Barton4,5, 1Internal Medicine, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, 2Rheumatology, UCSF, SF, CA, 3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 4Rheumatology, OHSU, Portland, OR, 5Rheumatology, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Compliance, DMARDs, medical necessity, medication side effects and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Adherence to disease-modifying
anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients ranges
from 30% to 107%, leading to potential adverse outcomes.  Patient beliefs about
medications and self-efficacy have been associated with decision-making and
adherence.  The aim of this study was to assess the association among medication
beliefs, self-efficacy, and adherence to oral DMARDs among diverse populations
with RA. 

 

Methods:

Data were derived from RA patients
enrolled in a longitudinal observational cohort (Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcomes
Study; RAOS).  Subjects completed a telephone interview in 2012-2013 in English
or Spanish that included measures of self-reported adherence (missing ≥1 dose in past week was considered to be poor
adherence) and the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ). The BMQ consists
of two 5-question subscales (specific necessity scale and specific concerns
scale), which are scored from 1 to 5 (agree strongly to disagree strongly),
summed and averaged. Higher scores indicate greater belief in medication
necessity or stronger concerns (e.g., beliefs about potential long-term effects
of taking medication). Logistic regression was used to estimate the association
of poor adherence with the BMQ subscales, with and without adjustment for
depressive symptoms, self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease
6-item Scale), demographics (race/ethnicity, age, gender, education) and RA
disease activity (global assessment).

Results:

Of 438 patients, 88% were
female, 29% Latino, mean age 61±13 years,
32% had high school education or less, 75% reported taking a synthetic DMARD.
Only 14% reported poor adherence to oral DMARDs. In terms of medication
beliefs, 64% reported that having to take medicines worries them, 81% reported
they sometimes worry about long-term effects of medicines, and 47% reported
worrying about becoming dependent on their medicines.  However 91% agreed with
the statement “my health, at present, depends on my medicines” and 92%
agreed that “my medicines will protect me from becoming worse.” In
multivariate analyses, the BMQ necessity score – but not the concerns subscale – was associated with lower odds of poor adherence.
Self-efficacy conversely was associated with higher odds of poor adherence
(table).

 

Conclusion:

In a diverse cohort of patients
with RA, our data suggest that patients who report stronger beliefs in the
necessity of medication are more likely to adhere to their DMARDs. Higher
self-efficacy scores were associated with greater odds of poor adherence. 
Given the often sub-optimal adherence to DMARDs, providers can play an
important role in enforcing positive patient beliefs about medications to improve
adherence and ultimately health outcomes.  Further research is needed to
explore how best to inform positive medication beliefs among diverse
populations with RA.   

 

 

 

 

 


Disclosure: C. McCulley, None; P. P. Katz, None; L. Trupin, None; E. H. Yelin, None; J. Barton, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McCulley C, Katz PP, Trupin L, Yelin EH, Barton J. Association of Medication Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence in a Diverse Cohort of Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-of-medication-beliefs-self-efficacy-and-adherence-in-a-diverse-cohort-of-adults-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-of-medication-beliefs-self-efficacy-and-adherence-in-a-diverse-cohort-of-adults-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology