ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0334

Association Between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Myasthenia Gravis: A Population-Based National Study

Sali Merjanah1, Ann Igoe2, David Kaelber3 and Robert Hal Scofield4, 1Boston University, Boston, MA, 2OhioHealth Hospital, Mansfield, OH, 3The MetroHealth System Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 4Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Demographics, Myasthenia Gravis, risk factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), thymectomy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Diagnosis (0323–0356)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and myasthenia gravis (MG) are two autoimmune disorders that have a young female preponderance, relapsing-remitting course, and positive antinuclear antibodies. The coexistence of SLE and MG has been reported in the literature with the majority of cases MG preceding SLE diagnosis1. There has been no controlled epidemiological study to prove a real association between these two diseases.

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of SLE among MG patients compared to non-MG patients and to study the demographics of the MG patients who developed SLE preceding or following MG diagnosis.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using the IBM Explorys database, a pooled de-identified clinical database of > 60 million unique patients in the US with patient-level data. The Explorys collects aggregated, standardized, and normalized clinical data from different electronic health records automatically updated in near real-time. International Classification of Diseases – 9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes were used to define SLE and MG patients. For SLE patients, the ICD code was used along with at least two rheumatologist visits for patients ≥ 18 years of age. The control group included adults ≥ 18 years of age with the exclusion of MG diagnosis. We further stratified the cohorts by adding the following variables to the search tool: age, race, gender, smoking status, thymectomy, autoimmune and miscellaneous comorbidities. The index date was defined as the date of the SLE diagnosis occurring in the MG patients. A chi-square test of association was performed along with the odds ratio (OR), its standard error, and the 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Prevalence rates of SLE and MG among total active patients of 59,896,040 were found to match the reported rates in the literature (0.1% and 0.04% subsequently)2,3.

Of the 26,110 patients with MG, 370 had a diagnosis of SLE (1.42%) compared to 65,000 of 59,869,730 controls (0.11%). MG patients found to have increased odds of SLE compared to control group (OR 13.38, 95% CI: 2.08 to 14.84, P < 0.0001).

Demographics and clinical characteristics of MG patients and controls with SLE are shown in table 1. Risk factors for increased SLE risk among MG patients are shown in table 2. Female sex, African American race, thymectomy, autoimmune diseases, and miscellaneous comorbidities such as thyroid disease were significantly more common in MG patients who developed lupus.

The MG cohort who underwent thymectomy (n = 730) had an increased risk of SLE (30 out of 730) compared to MG patients who didn’t undergo thymectomy (340 out of 25,380), (OR 3.11, 95% CI: 2.12 to 4.55, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Our study strongly supports the higher prevalence of SLE in MG patients and highlights the risk factors of the development of lupus in MG patients. MG patients should be evaluated for the coexistence of SLE especially in post-thymectomy patients and the young African American women with a history of other autoimmune diseases. Additionally, assessment for MG is suggested in lupus patients with unexplained muscular weakness.

References:
1. Cureus (2020);12(6): e8422.
2. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Nov 1;56(11):1945-1961.
3. Seminars in Neurology (2004); 24(1): 17-20

EE985C32-EAF4_4E65-9B9C-8465839B68FE.jpeg”

Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of MG patients and controls with SLE

F018A003-73EF_44D8-8A2F_39BAD07D96BE.jpeg”

Table 2. Risk factors for increased SLE prevalence among MG patients


Disclosures: S. Merjanah, None; A. Igoe, None; D. Kaelber, None; R. Scofield, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Merjanah S, Igoe A, Kaelber D, Scofield R. Association Between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Myasthenia Gravis: A Population-Based National Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-myasthenia-gravis-a-population-based-national-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-myasthenia-gravis-a-population-based-national-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology