ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 643

Association Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte, Monocyte to Lymphocyte, and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratios and Lupus Disease Activity and Lupus Nephritis

Philip Carlucci1, Elliot Luttrell-Williams 1, Rohit Bhan 1, Catherine Trad 1, Hanane El Bannoudi 1, Peter Izmirly 1, H. Michael Belmont 2, Jill Buyon 3 and Jeffrey Berger 1, 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, 2New York University School of Medicine, Ney York, 3New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Lupus and lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster I: Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are at elevated risk for end-organ damage. Lupus nephritis continues to be the complication with the highest standardized mortality ratio in SLE, yet clinicians have few tools to identify patients at risk. A complete blood count is a readily available test but little is known about its usefulness in tracking lupus nephritis and activity. In recent years, neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte (MLR), and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) ratios have emerged as markers of systemic inflammation. This study sought to evaluate the association between NLR, MLR, and PLR and its individual components and lupus disease activity and lupus nephritis.

Methods: 25 matched healthy controls and 85 patients fulfilling ACR or SLICC criteria for SLE were enrolled in the study and demographics, disease activity, as measured by the Hybrid SLEDAI, medications, and clinical manifestations were recorded. 20 lupus patients included in the study had active lupus nephritis, as defined by proteinuria greater than 500 mg/g creatinine. A complete blood cell count was assessed on all patients and healthy controls. Patients with platelet counts less than 100K or on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded from the study.

Results: Overall, SLE patients had a significantly higher PLR (p=0.0001), NLR (p=0.0003), and MLR (p=0.0035) compared to healthy controls. Lymphocyte counts alone negatively associated with SLEDAI (beta=-0.31, p=0.006) but monocyte, neutrophil, or platelet counts did not show a significant association with SLEDAI. All three ratios showed a significant positive association with SLEDAI in linear regression analysis with PLR being a better predictor than lymphocyte counts alone (beta=0.38, p< 0.0001). The associations between PLR or MLR but not NLR and SLEDAI remained significant in a multivariate linear regression model adjusting for age, race, sex, ethnicity, and medications. Specifically, the dose of glucocorticoids did not explain the clinical associations with these cellular ratios.  When evaluating active lupus nephritis, PLR (p=0.118) was not significant in a logistic regression and NLR (p=0.007) and MLR (p=0.007) performed equally well. These associations between NLR or MLR and active lupus nephritis persisted in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age, race, sex, ethnicity, and medications. Interestingly, lymphocyte, monocyte, neutrophil, or platelet counts alone did not associate with active lupus nephritis.

Conclusion: These data suggest that by using standard clinical labs to calculate NLR, MLR, and PLR clinicians may be able to better characterize lupus activity and current lupus nephritis.


Disclosure: P. Carlucci, None; E. Luttrell-Williams, None; R. Bhan, None; C. Trad, None; H. El Bannoudi, None; P. Izmirly, Glaxosmithkline, 5, GSK, 5; H. Belmont, None; J. Buyon, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, Exagen Diagnostics, 2; J. Berger, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Carlucci P, Luttrell-Williams E, Bhan R, Trad C, El Bannoudi H, Izmirly P, Belmont H, Buyon J, Berger J. Association Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte, Monocyte to Lymphocyte, and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratios and Lupus Disease Activity and Lupus Nephritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-monocyte-to-lymphocyte-and-platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratios-and-lupus-disease-activity-and-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-monocyte-to-lymphocyte-and-platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratios-and-lupus-disease-activity-and-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology