ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 510

Association between Clinical Response and Normalization of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post-Hoc Analysis from Two Phase 2b Filgotinib Studies

Mark C. Genovese1, Annegret Van der Aa2, Corinne Jamoul2, Chantal Tasset2, Pille Harrison2, René Westhovens3 and Arthur Kavanaugh4, 1Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 2Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium, 3University Hospitals Leuven on behalf of the CareRA Study Group, Leuven, Belgium, 4Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Janus kinase (JAK), patient-reported outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I: Comorbidities and Adverse Events; Efficacy and Safety of Small Molecules

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Filgotinib (GLPG0634, GS-6034) is an oral, selective JAK1 inhibitor that has demonstrated safety and efficacy data in two 24-week placebo-controlled phase 2B studies as add-on to methotrexate and as monotherapy in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR)1,2.

The objective is to evaluate the association between normalization of patient-reported outcome measures (PRO) and clinical response (ACR20) in MTX-IR RA patients treated with either filgotinib or placebo, as add-on to methotrexate (DARWIN 1), or as monotherapy (DARWIN 2).

 

Methods:

Patients with active RA were randomized in a double-blind manner to placebo (PBO) or one of 3 daily doses of filgotinib (FIL, 50mg, 100mg or 200mg) as once daily (DARWIN 1 and DARWIN 2) or twice daily regimen (DARWIN 1) for 24 weeks .This post-hoc analysis at week 12 (W12) included patients treated FIL 100mg and 200mg QD (selected Phase 3 doses), and PBO. PRO included SF-36 (mental and physical components: MCS and PCS respectively; cut-off 50), FACIT-F (cut-off 40), and HAQ-DI (cut-off 0.5).

 

Results:

594 and 283 patients with active RA were randomized in DARWIN 1 and 2 respectively.  In DARWIN 1, 44%, 64%, and 69% of patients on PBO, FIL 100mg QD and FIL 200mg QD respectively achieved ACR20 response at W12; in DARWIN 2 the respective response was 29%, 66%, and 72%. For all PRO parameters (SF-36 MCS, SF-36 PCS, FACIT-F and HAQ-DI) and in both studies, a higher proportion of patients with normalized scores was achieved in ACR20 responders compared to non-responders at W12 across treatment groups (Table 1). .

 

Conclusion:

This post-hoc analysis of two phase 2B studies in MTX-IR RA patients after 12 weeks of treatment suggests that normalization of PRO is associated with the ACR20 response, regardless of treatment with filgotinib and background MTX. 

 Table 1. Percentage of patients reaching normalized values for PRO at Week 12, by ACR20 response status.

% of patients

Placebo

100mg QD

200mg QD

DARWIN 1 (MTX add-on), W12, ITT-LOCF

 

ACR20 responders

N=38

ACR20 non-responders

N=48

ACR20 responders

N=54

ACR20 non-responders

N=31

ACR20 responders

N=59

ACR20 non-responders

N=27

SF-36 MCS ≥50

52.6

27.1

59.3

35.5

59.3

33.3

SF-36 PCS ≥50

7.9

0

14.8

0

16.9

0

FACIT-F ≥40

39.5

10.4

57.4

25.8

50.8

25.9

HAQ-DI ≤0.5

23.7

0

31.5

19.4

40.7

7.4

DARWIN 2 (monotherapy), W12, ITT-LOCF

 

ACR20 responders

N=21

ACR20 non-responders

N=51

ACR20 responders

N=46

ACR20 non-responders

N=24

ACR20 responders

N=50

ACR20 non-responders

N=19

SF-36 MCS ≥50

42.9

23.5

54.3

33.3

52.0

47.4

SF-36 PCS ≥50

9.5

2.0

17.4

4.2

14.0

10.5

FACIT-F ≥40

38.1

7.8

52.2

8.3

42.0

36.8

HAQ-DI ≤0.5

19.0

0

32.6

4.2

30.0

21.1

 

References

1Westhovens R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:998-1008; 2Kavanaugh A, et al.Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1009-1019.

 


Disclosure: M. C. Genovese, Gilead, 5,Galapagos NV, 5,AbbVie, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5; A. Van der Aa, Galapagos NV, 1,Galapagos NV, 3; C. Jamoul, Galapagos NV, 3; C. Tasset, Galapagos NV, 1,Galapagos NV, 3; P. Harrison, Galapagos NV, 1,Galapagos NV, 3; R. Westhovens, Celltrion, 5,BMS Research Fund, 5,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,Galapagos NV, 5; A. Kavanaugh, Gilead Sciences, Inc, 5,Galapagos NV, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,AbbVie, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Genovese MC, Van der Aa A, Jamoul C, Tasset C, Harrison P, Westhovens R, Kavanaugh A. Association between Clinical Response and Normalization of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post-Hoc Analysis from Two Phase 2b Filgotinib Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-clinical-response-and-normalization-of-patient-reported-outcome-measures-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-post-hoc-analysis-from-two-phase-2b-filgotinib-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-clinical-response-and-normalization-of-patient-reported-outcome-measures-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-post-hoc-analysis-from-two-phase-2b-filgotinib-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology