ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2531

Assessment of Pain Relief with Baricitinib By Treatment History in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Janet E. Pope1, Amanda Quebe2, Baojin Zhu2, Luna Sun2, Carol L. Gaich2, Francesco de Leonardis2, Anabela Cardoso2 and Mark C. Genovese3, 1St. Joseph's Health Care, Divsion of Rheumatology, London, ON, Canada, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pain, patient-reported outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatments Poster III: Biosimilars and New Compounds

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Baricitinib (BARI) 2 mg and 4 mg once daily demonstrated significant clinical improvements compared to placebo in the phase 3 study of RA patients on 1 or 2 cDMARDs with an inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (bDMARD-IR) (RA-BEACON).1 In this RA population, patients often experience pain, a key factor influencing quality of life. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to characterize the effects of BARI on pain relief by baseline pain and RA treatment history.

Methods: 527 patients were randomized to placebo (n=176), BARI 2 mg (n=174), or 4 mg (n=177) once daily for 24 weeks. The time of the primary endpoint was Week 12. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) at each study visit. The proportion of patients achieving ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥70% pain relief at Week 12 was compared between BARI 2 mg or 4 mg vs placebo using logistic models. The treatment comparisons within each subgroup category (pain < median [68] vs ≥median, number of prior TNF inhibitors [1 vs >1] and prior bDMARDs [<3 vs ≥3]) on pain relief were performed. Missing pain values were imputed using modified last observation-carried-forward (mLOCF).

Results:   Mean baseline pain scores were 65, 62, and 66 mm for placebo, BARI 2 mg, and BARI 4 mg, respectively. Approximately 40% of patients had received >1 TNF inhibitor and a quarter of patients had received ≥3 bDMARDs, representing patients with highly refractory disease. At Week 12, significantly more patients achieved ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥70% pain relief with BARI 2 mg or 4 mg vs placebo (P<0.05, for all comparisons).2 Consistent results were observed regardless of baseline pain (Table). Prior TNF inhibitor history appeared to influence the achievement of ≥70% pain relief, but had limited effect on the ≥30% and ≥50% pain thresholds. Variability in response for the 3 treatment groups was observed at the different pain relief thresholds for patients with <3 vs ≥3 bDMARDs. Regardless of treatment history, patients receiving BARI 2 mg or 4 mg were more likely to reach all pain relief thresholds than placebo.

Conclusion: BARI 2 mg or 4 mg provided greater pain relief in bDMARD-IR patients with RA compared with placebo in all patients and in patients with different baseline pain severity and prior treatment history.

References: 1Genovese MC, et al., N Engl J Med 2016;374:1243-52; 2Taylor PC, et al., Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:788 


Disclosure: J. E. Pope, AbbVie Inc., 5,Amgen Inc., 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,Lilly, 5,Merck & Co., 5,Novartis, 5,Pfizer, Inc., 5,Roche, 5,Sanofi, 5,Sandoz, 5,Celltrion, 5,United Chemicals Belgium, 2; A. Quebe, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; B. Zhu, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; L. Sun, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; C. L. Gaich, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; F. de Leonardis, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Cardoso, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; M. C. Genovese, Sanofi/Genzyme, Genentech/Roche, RPharm, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pope JE, Quebe A, Zhu B, Sun L, Gaich CL, de Leonardis F, Cardoso A, Genovese MC. Assessment of Pain Relief with Baricitinib By Treatment History in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-pain-relief-with-baricitinib-by-treatment-history-in-patients-with-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-pain-relief-with-baricitinib-by-treatment-history-in-patients-with-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology