ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 420

Assessment of Fatigue in Adults with Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Qualitative Study to Explore What Patients Feel Should Be Measured in Clinical Trials

Sally Mannix1, Andrea Beyer 2, Vibeke Strand 3, Leslie Hanrahan 4, Cristina Abel 5, Bruno Flamion 2 and Asha Hareendran 6, 1Evidera, Bethesda, 2Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland, 3Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 4Lupus Foundation of America, Washington DC, 5Evidera, Bethesda, MD, 6Evidera, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I: Patient Reported Outcomes

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms reported by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is responsible for considerable loss of time at work and greatly impaired quality of life. There is a lack of patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments developed with input from patients with SLE. To collect evidence of content validity required by regulatory agencies for a PRO tool to support label claims, this qualitative study aimed to understand SLE patients’ experience of fatigue and to assess the FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) questionnaire used extensively in health research to evaluate fatigue. Evaluation of the FACIT-F content was informed by a literature review and guided by a project steering committee (PSC; consisting of a patient advocate, a clinical expert, and an outcomes measure expert).

Methods: The study, approved by an institutional review board, involved focus groups (Round 1) and cognitive interviews (Round 2) with adults with moderate to severely active SLE. All participants provided written informed consent. In Round 1, three focus groups were conducted to understand the disease and fatigue-related concepts that were most important to patients; participants also provided high-level feedback on the FACIT-F. Round 2 included 13 one-on-one cognitive interviews to collect more nuanced feedback on the relevance of content, clarity, and comprehensiveness of the FACIT-F. The qualitative interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed; content analysis methods were used to analyze the transcripts to achieve the study objectives. The PSC reviewed the results and contributed to decision making. Specific attention was given to determine the comprehensiveness and participant understanding of the FACIT-F and any gaps in concept coverage to evaluate fatigue in the context of a clinical trial.

Results: A total of 28 adult patients with moderate to severe SLE, mostly female (n=27) with a mean age of 45.5 ± 12.1 years (range: 18–75 years) participated in the study; 23 (82%) had moderate disease activity and five (18%) severe SLE. All participants were receiving treatment to manage their SLE at the time of the study and most (n=23, 82%) reported fatigue among the top three most important SLE-related symptoms. Fatigue was described as profoundly impacting their daily life, including the ability to perform chores, work-related activities, maintain personal hygiene, exercise, and participate in hobbies. Study participants reported that the FACIT-F covered concepts most relevant to their experience of fatigue. Participants were able to understand the instructions, items, and response options of the instrument and felt that the recall period of 7 days was appropriate.

Conclusion: Fatigue was one of the most important symptoms that had a significant impact on adults with moderate to severely active SLE, limiting their ability to perform activities they needed or wanted to do.  The FACIT-F was found to be an appropriate measure for the assessment of fatigue in this sample. Evidence of content validity of the FACIT-F in adults with SLE was confirmed for its use to support endpoints in Idorsia’s Cenerimod Assessing S1P1 Receptor Modulation in SLE (CARE) clinical trial.


Disclosure: S. Mannix, None; A. Beyer, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals LTD, 3; V. Strand, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, Amgen, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, AURA, 8, Bayer, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Celltrion, 5, Cleveland Clinic, 8, CORRONA, 5, Crescendo, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Genentech, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 5, Horizon, 5, Inmedix, 5, Janssen, 5, Kezar, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, NACCME, 8, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Purdue, 8, RA Forum, 8, RAN, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Samsung, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, Servier, 5, Setpoint, 5, SLRA, 8, UCB, 5, Up to Date, 7, Washington University, 8, WIR, 8, WRA, 8; L. Hanrahan, None; C. Abel, None; B. Flamion, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, 1, 3, 4; A. Hareendran, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mannix S, Beyer A, Strand V, Hanrahan L, Abel C, Flamion B, Hareendran A. Assessment of Fatigue in Adults with Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Qualitative Study to Explore What Patients Feel Should Be Measured in Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-fatigue-in-adults-with-moderate-to-severe-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-a-qualitative-study-to-explore-what-patients-feel-should-be-measured-in-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-fatigue-in-adults-with-moderate-to-severe-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-a-qualitative-study-to-explore-what-patients-feel-should-be-measured-in-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology