ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 69

Assessment of Exercise Status in Routine Care Using Patient Reported Outcomes: Initiating Exercise Is Associated with Better Outcomes Than No Exercise

Isabel Castrejón1, Selda Celik2, Theodore Pincus1 and Yusuf Yazici3, 1Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Rheumatology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: exercise, outcome measures and patient outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health: Osteoporosis, Non-Inflammatory Arthritis and More

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Extensive evidence indicates major benefits of exercise in rheumatoid arthritis1 and many other rheumatic diseases,2 not only for cardiovascular and general fitness, but also for better rheumatologic clinical status. Most reported exercise data are derived from structured research studies rather than from usual care. A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) designed for usual care includes a query concerning exercise status for the rheumatologist to analyze possible associations with clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare baseline demographic and clinical data and changes in status over 1 year, in patients classified into 4 categories according to the level of exercise.

Methods: Each patient seen at an academic rheumatology setting completes an MDHAQ at each visit while waiting to see the rheumatologist. The MDHAQ includes scores for physical function, pain, patient global estimate (PATGL), and RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data), an index of these 3 measures, each scored 0-10; total=0-30. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to exercise 3 times a week at baseline and 1 year: EX at baseline & 1 year later, no EX at baseline but EX 1 yr later, EX at baseline but no 1 yr later and no EX at baseline or 1yr later. Mean baseline data and percentage change from baseline to 1 year were analyzed and compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), with multivariate adjustment for age, disease duration, education, sex and baseline physical function (MANOVA).

Results: 795 patients, including 221 with RA, were classified into 4 exercise groups: EX at baseline & 1 year later, no EX at baseline but EX 1 yr later, EX at baseline but no 1 yr later and no EX at baseline or 1yr later. Patients doing exercise at baseline were younger with a higher level of education than the NO exercise group (data not shown). Patients reporting no exercise at baseline and exercise 1 year later had greater improvement in scores than those in all other groups. Patients reporting exercise at baseline but not 1 yr later were the only group with poorer status. A potential limitation for our study is that it was unknown if change in exercise status preceded or resulted from change in clinical status. 

 

EX at baseline & 1 year later

N=268 (33.7%)

No EX at baseline but EX at 1 year

N=126 (15.8%)

EX at baseline No EX at 1 year

N=77 (9.7%)

No EX at baseline or 1 year later

N=324 (40.7%)

Baseline Mean (SD)

Mean change (%)

Baseline Mean (SD)

Mean change (%)

Baseline Mean (SD)

Mean change (%)

Baseline Mean (SD)

Mean change (%)

MDHAQ-FN (0-10)

1.5 (1.8)

-0.2 (-13.3)

2.3 (2.1)

-0.8 (-34.7)

2.0 (1.9)

0.3 (15.0)

2.7 (2.1)

-0.01 (-0.4)

MDHAQ-PN (0-10)

3.9 (2.9)

-0.5 (-12.8)

5.0 (3.1)

-1.7 (-34.0)

4.4 (2.9)

-0.2 (-4.5)

5.6 (3.0)

-0.8 (-14.3)

PATGL (0-10)

3.6 (2.7)

-0.4 (-11.1)

4.5 (2.8)

-1.8 (-40.0)

4.2 (2.8)

0.2 (4.8)

5.4 (2.7)

-0.8 (-14.8)

RAPID3 (0-30)

9.0 (6.5)

-1.2 (-13.3)

11.8 (7.3)

-4.4 (-37.3)

10.5 (6.3)

0.3 (2.8)

13.7 (6.9)

-1.7 (-12.4)

RADAI (0-48)

7 (9)

-2.1 (-28.0)

10 (10)

-3.9 (-37.9)

10 (8)

0.1 (1.2)

12 (11)

-0.3 (-2.4)

P<0.0001 for all comparisons. Negative change indicates improvement & positive change worsening

Conclusion: Exercise 3 times a week is associated with better clinical status. The best status was seen for patients who report no EX at baseline but performing EX 1yr later while poorest status was seen in patients reporting exercise at baseline but no 1 yr later. Regular exercise may be of therapeutic relevance in the management of rheumatic diseases by reducing pain and improving physical function. This clinically relevant information concerning exercise is available on MDHAQ for routine care settings.

References: 1. Sokka T, Hakkinen A. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008; 26(5 Suppl 51):S14-20. 2. Perandini LA, de Sa-Pinto AL, Roschel H, et al. Autoimmunity Rev 2012;12:218-24


Disclosure:

I. Castrejón,
None;

S. Celik,
None;

T. Pincus,
None;

Y. Yazici,

Celgen, BMS,genentech,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-exercise-status-in-routine-care-using-patient-reported-outcomes-initiating-exercise-is-associated-with-better-outcomes-than-no-exercise/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology