ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2891

Assessment of Disability Levels in a Cohort of 1,489 Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis, and the Effect of Apremilast Treatment: Pooled Data from Three Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trials

Philip J. Mease1, Jürgen Wollenhaupt2, Stephen Hall3, Filip van Den Bosch4, Eric Lespessailles5, Melissa McIlraith6, Lichen Teng6 and Christopher J. Edwards7, 1Rheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 2Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany, 3Monash University, CabriniHealth, Melbourne, Australia, 4Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, VIB, Ghent, Belgium, 5University of Orléans, Orléans, France, 6Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ, 7University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: PsA, a chronic systemic
inflammatory disease, reduces physical function and QOL. Treatment improves/maintains
functionality.
PALACE 1-3
compared apremilast (APR) efficacy/safety with placebo (PBO) in patients (pts)
with active PsA despite prior conventional DMARDs and/or biologics, providing
one of the largest databases (N=1,489) examining physical disability in
moderate to severe PsA pts. The impact of APR 30 mg BID (APR30) treatment over
104 wks on disability was assessed using the HAQ-DI in a pooled analysis of the
PALACE 1-3 database.

Methods:
Pts were randomized (1:1:1)
to PBO, APR30, or APR 20 mg BID (APR20) stratified by baseline (BL) DMARD use (yes/no).
At Wk 24, all remaining PBO pts were re-randomized to APR30 or APR20. HAQ-DI scores
were collected at BL and Wks 16, 24, 40, 52 65, 78, 91, and 104. Data are analyzed
by ITT, LOCF methodology for Wk 16, and described as data as observed to Wk 104,
with LOCF analysis done to confirm results. HAQ-DI MCID
decreases ≥0.13 and ≥0.30 were prespecified; a post hoc analysis for
the most recently published MCID ≥0.35 was done. Disability categories were
calculated using HAQ-DI cutoff levels ≤1.0 (clinically significant disability1)
and ≤0.5 (MDA criteria2); assessments included proportion
reaching levels ≤0.25. Shift categories of scores were
examined with increments of 0.25 to clarify pt disability level and category shifts.

Results: Pts exhibited significant physical
disability at BL (mean HAQ-DI=1.2); 60% of APR30 pts had >1.0, and 31% had >1.5,
noting marked difficulty/need for assistive devices in performing activities of
daily living. Major disability was noted in up to 13% with BL HAQ-DI >1.875.
As early as Wk 16, physical function improved with APR30; pts exhibited a mean
HAQ-DI change of -0.21 (vs. -0.07 PBO; P<0.0001), 56% achieved HAQ-DI
≤1.0 at Wk 16 (vs. 48% PBO pts), and 29%
achieved HAQ-DI ≤0.5 (vs. 25% PBO pts). Fewer PBO vs.
APR30 pts reached MCID of -0.13 (37% vs. 47%; P<0.005)
and -0.30 and -0.35 (26% vs. 36%; P<0.005). At Wk 52, decreases in disability
were maintained (APR30 mean change in HAQ-DI=-0.33); 48% of APR30 pts achieved
MCID -0.30 and 48% MCID -0.35. Importantly, at Wk 52, 59% of all APR30 pts achieved
HAQ-DI ≤1.0, 35% ≤0.5, and 25% ≤0.25 (Table). Among pts with greater BL
disability (HAQ-DI
≥1.5), 64% improved
by ≥1 shift category and 48% by ≥2. At Wk 104, 50% of APR30 pts achieved MCID -0.30 and
MCID -0.35, with 64% achieving HAQ-DI ≤1.0, 40% ≤0.5, and 29% ≤0.25.

Conclusion: In APR30 pts, physical function improved
and was sustained with long-term treatment. Most pts achieved HAQ-DI MCID -0.30
or -0.35 and HAQ-DI scores ≤1.0, with many obtaining HAQ-DI ≤0.5, defined
as minimal disease in recently developed criteria. These data indicate
improvement and long-term maintenance of functionality with APR treatment.

References: 1. Sokka T, et al. Arthritis Rheum.
2003;48:59-63. 2. Coates LC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:48-53.


Disclosure: P. J. Mease, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Abbvie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, 2,Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Abbvie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, Vertex;, 5,Abbvie, Amgen, BiogenIdec, BMS, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, 8; J. Wollenhaupt, Roche, Chugai Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Abbott, and UCB, 5,Roche, Chugai Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Abbott, and UCB, 8; S. Hall, Celgene Corporation, Pfizer, UCB, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, 5,Celgene Corporation, Pfizer, UCB, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, 2; F. van Den Bosch, Abbvie, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8; E. Lespessailles, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Servier, 2; M. McIlraith, Celgene Corporation, 3; L. Teng, Celgene Cororation, 3; C. J. Edwards, Abbvie, Pfizer, Lilly, Celtrion, Mundipharma, Samsung, Anthera, UCB, Celgene, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease PJ, Wollenhaupt J, Hall S, van Den Bosch F, Lespessailles E, McIlraith M, Teng L, Edwards CJ. Assessment of Disability Levels in a Cohort of 1,489 Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis, and the Effect of Apremilast Treatment: Pooled Data from Three Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-disability-levels-in-a-cohort-of-1489-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-the-effect-of-apremilast-treatment-pooled-data-from-three-phase-iii-randomized-controlled-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-disability-levels-in-a-cohort-of-1489-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-the-effect-of-apremilast-treatment-pooled-data-from-three-phase-iii-randomized-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology