ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1185

Assessment of a Rheumatology Curriculum Utilizing Multiple Learning Modalities

Joshua Scott1 and Daniel Battafarano2, 1Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA - Ft Sam Houston, TX, 2Rheumatology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA - Ft Sam Houston, TX

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Curriculum, education and rheumatic education

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Education Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   Graduate medical education has evolved to
incorporate more interactive learning modalities, such as audience response,
problem based learning, and patient encounters. 
We have incorporated these modalities into the rheumatology series of
the internal medicine (IM) residency didactic sessions at our institution.  This curriculum was assessed utilizing survey
data from participants evaluating self-assessment of rheumatology knowledge and
preference of learning modality.

Methods: Over a 4
week period IM residents attended 12 hours of didactic sessions dedicated to
rheumatology education taught by the rheumatology department.  The didactic sessions were divided into
lecture, interactive lecture with audience response, rheumatology patient
encounters, case based learning, and arthrocentesis simulation lab (Table
1).  The effectiveness of our curriculum
was measured utilizing survey data collected from participants evaluating
pre-curriculum and post-curriculum self-assessment of rheumatology knowledge on
a 10 point Likert scale (0=very poor, 10=very good).  The survey tool also evaluated preferred
learning modality on a 10 point Likert scale (0=not preferred, 10=most
preferred).  The learning modality
preference data was analyzed utilizing a four factor repeated measures ANOVA
and Bonferroni corrected post hoc analysis between
modalities.

Table 1  Rheumatology Curriculum for IM residents

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Hour 1

Lecture1

Interactive Lecture3

Lecture

Case Based Learning

Hour 2

Arthrocentesis Simulation Lab2

Patient Encounter4

Case Based Learning

Case Based Learning

Hour 3

Arthrocentesis Simulation Lab

Case Based Learning5

Patient Encounter

Interactive Lecture

Definitions: 1Lecture is a PowerPoint style. 2Arthrocentesis Simulation Lab utilizes joint models to teach arthrocentesis/injection. 3Interactive Lecture is a PowerPoint style with audience response or knowledge bowl style.  4Patient Encounter is interaction with a patient who has a rheumatic disease and discussion led by rheumatology staff/fellow.  5Case based learning is a small group discussion of ACR Rheum2Learn modules.

 Results: A total of 65 participants attended the didactic sessions,
44/65 (67.7%) completed the survey.  The
participant’s pre-curriculum self-assessment mean was 3.98 and post assessment
mean was 6.61.  This increase of 2.63 was
statistically significant (p <0.001). 
The results of the learning modality assessment are presented in table
2, the most preferred learning modality was rheumatology patient encounters and
least preferred was lecture. 

Table 2  Learning Modality Preference Results

Mean (n=44)

Range

p-value*

Lecture

6.07

1-9

–

Arthrocentesis Simulation Lab

6.75

3-10

0.196

Interactive Lecture

6.93

3-9

<0.001

Rheumatology Patient Encounter

8.07

3-10

<0.001

Case Based Learning

7.55

3-10

<0.001

   *from post-hoc comparison of each modality to lecture

Conclusion:
IM residents found a curriculum utilizing multiple educational modalities very
effective to improve rheumatology knowledge. 
IM residents prefer interactive teaching modalities to basic
lecture.  The most preferred method of instruction
included the use of direct patient encounters guided by a rheumatology
interview, examination, and discussion.


Disclosure: J. Scott, None; D. Battafarano, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Scott J, Battafarano D. Assessment of a Rheumatology Curriculum Utilizing Multiple Learning Modalities [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-a-rheumatology-curriculum-utilizing-multiple-learning-modalities/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-a-rheumatology-curriculum-utilizing-multiple-learning-modalities/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology