ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1615

Assessment of a Cognitive Impairment Measure in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Nicole Davidson1, Alexa Meara2, Holly Steigelman3, Songzhu Zhao4, Guy Brock5, Wael Jarjour6, Brad H. Rovin7, Samir parikh4, Hareth M. Madhoun8, Lee Hebert9, Isabelle Ayoub4 and Stacy P. Ardoin10, 1The Ohio State University, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 3The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 4The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 5Department of Biomedical Informatics and Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 6Department of Rheumatology/Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 7Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 8Rheumatology/Immunology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 9Medicine, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 10Pediatric & Adult Rheumatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Co-morbidities, measure and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II: Damage and Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: : Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease which can impact the central nervous system in multiple ways, including development of cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction is commonly reported in SLE and difficult to detect. Currently used diagnostic methods including neurocognitive testing batteries are time consuming, costly and challenging to implement in clinic. This project used the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Exam (SAGE) screening test for cognitive impairment, a simple patient-completed paper test, validated for dementia, diabetes and other diseases but not SLE

Methods:

The patient population included 118 patients participating in The Ohio State University Lupus, Vasculitis and Glomerulonephritis Registry. All subjects provided informed consent, completed the SAGE instrument and supplied demographic and medical history information. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics Damage Index (SLICC-DI) were completed on all subjects. SAGE instruments, scored by a trained individual, were grouped into two categories: normal (SAGE score > 16) and abnormal (SAGE score ≤ 16). Univariate analysis was performed to assess the relationship between normal and abnormal SAGE scores and several clinical variables. Variables with p < 0.15 from the univariate analysis were initially included in multivariable logistic regression modeling. Variables with p>0.05 were subsequently removed sequentially from multivariate model using the backward selection strategy.

Results: Of the 118 subjects in this study, 97 scored in the normal range (>16) and 21 scored in the abnormal range (≤ 16). Race, ethnicity, education level and household income were significantly associated by univariate analysis with normal versus abnormal SAGE scores at the p<0.15 level were initially included in the multivariable model (Table 1). Abnormal SAGE scores were associated with higher overall SLICC DI scores but not with a neuropsychiatric-specific SLICC DI score. In multivariable analysis there was an independent association between abnormal SAGE score and higher SLICC DI score (odds ratio (OR) = 1.44, 95%CI 1.01-1.11, p-value=0.03), Hispanic ethnicity (OR=43.4, 95%CI 3.1-601, p-value=0.005) and lower household income (OR=11.9 for ≤$15,000 vs >$50,000, 95%CI 2.45-57. 8, p-value=0.002).

Conclusion:

Study results show a significant independent relationship between neurocognitive impairment as measured by SAGE score and higher lupus related damage as measured by SLICC DI scores. Abnormal SAGE scores were associated with lower household income and Hispanic ethnicity, which may suggest language barriers and a need for a Spanish version of the instrument. Finally, the SAGE was feasible to measure in the clinic setting. Further validation studies in SLE are needed.

Table 1 Association of clinical variables with normal and abnormal SAGE score

Normal SAGE score

(N=97)

Abnormal SAGE score

(N=21)

P-value1

N (%)

N (%)

Gender

Female

86 (88.66)

20 (95.24)

Male

11 (11.34)

1 (4.76)

0.6904

Race

White

65 (67.01)

7 (33.33)

Black

25 (25.77)

12 (57.14)

Other

7 (7.22)

2 (9.52)

0.0126

Ethnicity

Hispanic or Latino

2 (2.06)

3 (14.29)

Not Hispanic or Latino

95 (97.94)

18 (85.71)

0.0388

Household Income

up to $15,000

11 (13.41)

10 (58.82)

$15,001 – $50,000

35 (42.68)

4 (23.53)

> $50,000

36 (43.90)

3 (17.65)

0.0002

Education

≤High school/GED

17 (18.09)

9 (42.86)

College < four years

22 (23.40)

4 (19.05)

College ≥4 years

48 (51.06)

7 (33.33)

Other

7 (7.45)

1 (4.76)

0.1236

Antidepressant

Yes

30 (30.93)

6 (28.57)

No

67 (69.07)

15 (71.43)

0.8316

Hydroxychloroquine

Yes

85 (87.63)

18 (85.71)

No

12 (12.37)

3 (14.29)

0.7294

Immunosuppressant

Yes

60 (61.86)

15 (71.43)

No

37 (38.14)

6 (28.57)

0.4086

Narcotic

Yes

28 (28.87)

7 (33.33)

No

69 (71.13)

14 (66.67)

0.6845

Other Neuroactive

Yes

34 (35.05)

9 (42.86)

No

63 (64.95)

12 (57.14)

0.5004

Prednisone

Yes

66 (68.04)

15 (71.43)

No

31 (31.96)

6 (28.57)

0.7616

Feel Sad/Depressed

Yes

12 (12.37)

3 (14.29)

Occasionally

31 (31.96)

6 (28.57)

No

54 (55.67)

12 (57.14)

0.9419

SLICC DI Sore

0

41 (44.09)

5 (23.81)

1 or higher

52 (55.91)

16 (76.19)

0.0871

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

P-value²

Age (years)

41.40 (12.82)

43.67 (12.50)

0.4626

Median (Min, Max)

Median (Min, Max)

P-value3

Prednisone Dose (mg)

5 (0, 60)

5 (0, 40)

0.6919

SLEDAI Score

2 (0, 31)

2 (0, 16)

0.8680

SLICC DI Score

1 (0, 9)

2 (0, 7)

0.0465

SLEDAI: Systemic lupus erythematosis disease activity index; SLICC DI: Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics Damage Index; SAGE: Self-Administered Gerocognitive Exam; GED: General Educational Development.

¹ P-value from chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test

² P-value from t-test

³ P-value from Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test


Disclosure: N. Davidson, None; A. Meara, None; H. Steigelman, None; S. Zhao, None; G. Brock, None; W. Jarjour, None; B. H. Rovin, None; S. parikh, None; H. M. Madhoun, None; L. Hebert, None; I. Ayoub, None; S. P. Ardoin, not applicable, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Davidson N, Meara A, Steigelman H, Zhao S, Brock G, Jarjour W, Rovin BH, parikh S, Madhoun HM, Hebert L, Ayoub I, Ardoin SP. Assessment of a Cognitive Impairment Measure in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-a-cognitive-impairment-measure-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-a-cognitive-impairment-measure-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology