ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0485

Assessing the Effectiveness of Tocilizumab in Newly Diagnosed Giant Cell Arteritis versus Refractory/recurrent Giant Cell Arteritis in Clinical Practice

Julio Sánchez-Martín1, Javier Loricera2, Clara Moriano3, Santos Castañeda4, F. Javier Narváez5, Vicente Aldasoro6, Olga Maiz7, Rafael Melero8, Juan Ignacio Villa Blanco9, Paloma Vela-Casasempere10, Susana Romero Yuste11, José Luis Callejas12, Eugenio De Miguel13, Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa14, Francisca Sivera15, Jesus Fernandez16, Carles Galisteo17, Ivan Ferraz Amaro18, Lara Sánchez-Bilbao1, Monica Calderon-Goercke19, Miguel Ángel González-Gay20 and Ricardo Blanco2, 1Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain, 3Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain, 4Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, IIS-Princesa, Madrid, Spain, 5Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 6Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, 7Hospital Universitario de Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain, 8Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain, 9Sierrallana Hospital, Torrelavega, Spain, 10Hospital General Universitario Alicante, Alicante, Spain, 11Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, Pontevedra, Spain, 12Hospital San Cecilio, Granada, Spain, 13Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 14Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain, 15Hospital Universitario de Elda, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain, 16Hospital de La Coruña, La Coruña, Spain, 17Hospital Parc Tauli,, Sabadel, Spain, 18Division of Rheumatology. Hospital Universitario de Canarias. Spain., Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 19Hospital de Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain, 20Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, Universidad de Cantabria; Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla; Research group on genetic epidemiology and atherosclerosis in systemic diseases and in metabolic diseases of the musculoskeletal system, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain. Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and Genomics Research Unit, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Biologicals, giant cell arteritis, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated and Related Disorders Poster I: Giant Cell Arteritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biologic drug approved in giant cell arteritis (GCA), based in two clinical trials (CT) (1,2). CT included selected patients who may differ from those of clinical practice (CP). A high proportion of GCA patients treated with TCZ in CT had a newly diagnosed GCA, whereas in CP, most of them are refractory/recurrent GCA (3,4). Although in CT the efficacy of TCZ seems to be similar in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA, in CP it is not documented.

The purpose of this study is to compare in CP, the effectiveness and safety of TCZ in newly diagnosed vs refractory/recurrent GCA.

Methods: Multicentre observational study on 471 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques.A comparative study between patients with newly diagnosed GCA (< 6 weeks) and those with refractory/recurrent GCA ( >6 weeks) (according to GiACTA study definitions) (2). Sustained remission was based on EULAR definitions (5).

Results: The 471 GCA patients were divided into 2 subgroups: a) newly diagnosed GCA (n=91) and b) refractory/recurrent GCA (n=380) (TABLE).No significant differences were observed between both groups in sustained remission, although a greater tendency towards sustained remission is observed in newly diagnosed than in refractory/recurrent GCA patients (FIGURE). The decrease in glucocorticoids dose was faster in the first three months in the newly diagnosed GCA group, but thereafter, was similar in both groups, as well as the appearance of relevant adverse events and serious infections.

Conclusion: The effectiveness and safety of TCZ seems to be similar in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA.

References
1. Villiger PM, et al. Lancet. 2016; 387:1921-1927. PMID: 26952547
2. Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-328. PMID: 28745999
3. Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091
4. Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020; 124: S112-119. PMID: 32441643
5. Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Supporting image 1

Main features of patients with newly diagnosed GCA and refractory/recurrent GCA treated with tocilizumab.

Supporting image 2

A) Sustained remission, and B) median prednisone dose required in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA treated with tocilizumab.


Disclosures: J. Sánchez-Martín, None; J. Loricera, Novartis, UCB, Celgene, Roche; C. Moriano, None; S. Castañeda, Roche; F. Narváez, None; V. Aldasoro, None; O. Maiz, None; R. Melero, None; J. Villa Blanco, None; P. Vela-Casasempere, None; S. Romero Yuste, Pfizer, Lilly, AbbVie, Biogen, Sanofi; J. Callejas, None; E. De Miguel, None; E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa, None; F. Sivera, None; J. Fernandez, None; C. Galisteo, None; I. Ferraz Amaro, AbbVie/Abbott, Merck/MSD, Janssen, Roche, AbbVie/Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Merck/MSD; L. Sánchez-Bilbao, Eli Lilly; M. Calderon-Goercke, None; M. González-Gay, AbbVie/Abbott, Merck/MSD, Janssen, Roche, AbbVie/Abbott, Roche, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Celgene, Sobi, Merck/MSD; R. Blanco, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Novartis, Sanofi.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sánchez-Martín J, Loricera J, Moriano C, Castañeda S, Narváez F, Aldasoro V, Maiz O, Melero R, Villa Blanco J, Vela-Casasempere P, Romero Yuste S, Callejas J, De Miguel E, Galíndez-Agirregoikoa E, Sivera F, Fernandez J, Galisteo C, Ferraz Amaro I, Sánchez-Bilbao L, Calderon-Goercke M, González-Gay M, Blanco R. Assessing the Effectiveness of Tocilizumab in Newly Diagnosed Giant Cell Arteritis versus Refractory/recurrent Giant Cell Arteritis in Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-effectiveness-of-tocilizumab-in-newly-diagnosed-giant-cell-arteritis-versus-refractory-recurrent-giant-cell-arteritis-in-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-effectiveness-of-tocilizumab-in-newly-diagnosed-giant-cell-arteritis-versus-refractory-recurrent-giant-cell-arteritis-in-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology