Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flares are common, poorly defined, and understudied. A tool is needed to measure significant RA flares that may signal need for evaluation for treatment change. Qualitative and quantitative research by the OMERACT RA Flare Group with patients and providers has identified an RA Flare Core Domain Set, ratified by OM 2012 attendees. Next, we identified preliminary flare questions (PFQs) to assess core domains. Here, we report evidence of discriminant validity of PFQs between patients who report flaring and those not in flare and convergent validity among PFQs and validated RA measures in a cohort of patients with early RA (ERA).
Methods: 1190 patients in the Canadian early ArThritis CoHort (CATCH) completed PFQs at visits from 11-2011 through 5-2013. Both patients and MDs independently rated if patient was in flare. Patients completed PFQs for pain, physical function (PF), fatigue, stiffness, participation and coping over 1 week prior to visit using 11-point scales, as well as HAQ, SF12, RADAI, WPAI and Patient Global. Wilcoxon rank sum and χ2 were used to compare groups. Correlations (Spearman, polychoric, polyserial) were calculated between PFQs and relevant HAQ, SF12, WPAI, RADAI items and other scales.
Results: Participants were mostly female (74%), white (81%), and 55% had > high school education. Mean (SD) age was 53 (15) years and RA duration 6 (3) months. 33% of patients and 38% of MDs classified patient as being in flare; agreement for being in flare was 62% and not in flare 73% (kappa = .33; 95% CI .28-.39). Scores were significantly higher across all domains in patients reporting flare (Table). Correlations were strongest between PFQ pain and other pain scales (r’s=.84-.88). Moderate-strong correlations were evident among PFQ with other measures of PF (r’s= .63-.75), fatigue (r’s= .52-.85), stiffness (r=.66), participation (r’s=.60-.77) and coping (r’s=.30-.55).
Conclusion: In ERA patients who report being in flare, PFQ scores were significantly higher across all domains. There was substantial agreement among single item PFQs and other validated RA measures. Results provide evidence of the validity of OMERACT PFQs to assess flares in RA patients. Additional psychometric evaluation is needed to establish the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of items and relevant thresholds across a range of RA populations and settings prior to widespread use.
Comparison of OMERACT PFQ domain scores in patients reporting and not reporting being in RA flare (N=1190). |
|||
|
Not in Flare |
Flare |
Significance |
Reported RA as worse* in past week |
43% |
17% |
<.001 |
OM PFQs† |
|
|
|
Pain |
2.5 + 2.5 |
6.0 + 2.6 |
<.0001 |
Physical Function |
2.2 + 2.5 |
5.5 + 3.0 |
<.0001 |
Fatigue |
2.7 + 2.8 |
5.3 + 3.1 |
<.0001 |
Stiffness |
2.4 + 2.5 |
5.6 + 2.9 |
<.0001 |
Participation |
2.0 + 2.5 |
5.1 + 3.1 |
<.0001 |
Coping |
1.8 + 2.3 |
4.3 + 2.8 |
<.0001 |
†Higher scores reflect great impairment; *slightly worse, worse or much worse. |
Disclosure:
S. J. Bartlett,
None;
C. O. Bingham III,
OMERACT,
6;
E. Choy,
None;
J. Xiong,
None;
G. Boire,
None;
B. Haraoui,
None;
J. E. Pope,
None;
J. C. Thorne,
None;
C. A. Hitchon,
None;
D. Tin,
None;
E. C. Keystone,
None;
V. P. Bykerk,
Various,
2.
« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-significant-flares-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-validity-of-the-outcome-measures-in-rheumatology-preliminary-flare-questions-in-the-canadian-early-arthritis-cohort/