ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2784

Are We over-Testing for Liver Enzyme Abnormalities in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Prescribed Methotrexate?

Chi Chi Lau1, Syeda Maria Sayeed1, Amanda Kennedy2, Joan Skelly3 and Sheldon Cooper4, 1Rheumatology/ Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 2Internal Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 3Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 4Department of Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Liver chemistry and methotrexate (MTX)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects IV: Medications and Risk

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:   Methotrexate (MTX) is a first line drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) that  is associated with elevated liver function tests (LFTs) in 10- 20% of patients though only 2-3 % of patients stop MTX for this side effect.  Current guidelines advise LFT testing every 2 to 3 months with little data to support the utility of such monitoring.  Our goal was to describe changes made to MTX dosing in response to elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and define any correlation between elevated AST to MTX dose and duration of therapy.

Methods:   The electronic health records of RA patients on MTX from  7/1/2009 to 12/31/2015 were reviewed for elevated AST values (>46 U/L),) which were categorized as mild ( >1- < 2x upper limits of normal,ULN) or severe (³2x ULN).  We recorded the MTX dose and duration, and action taken on the dose (continued, decreased, stopped, or stopped for other reason than MTX) at the time of the AST elevation.  The last AST observed for each patient while on MTX was used for analysis.  Fisher’s Exact test was used to compare the proportions of actions taken in each AST category. A Spearman correlation was used to assess the correlation between MTX dose and AST levels; t-tests were used to compare MTX duration between the AST levels.

Results:   Of 1158 RA patients taking MTX, 235 (20.2%) had at least one elevated AST value. Sixteen (6.8%) patients with elevated AST stopped MTX, because of provider concern for hepatotoxicity from the drug.  Most patients (78%) with mild AST elevation continued MTX (p<0.0005), although 18% of patients continued MTX despite severe AST elevation (Figure 1).  Providers stopped MTX for other reasons (infection, malignancy, cardiac event, cholelithiasis) in 76% of patients with severe AST elevation.  There was no correlation between MTX dose and elevated AST (Spearman correlation = -0.015).  Patients with mild AST elevation were on MTX for a mean (SD) of 73.3 (60.7) months which was no different from those with severe AST elevation at 69.5 (47.2) months, p=0.736 (Figure 2, AST level vs MTX duration).   

Conclusion:    Liver enzyme elevation, as measured by AST level, rarely resulted in MTX cessation for suspected MTX toxicity.  The most common reason for stopping MTX was for AST elevation in the presence of an acute illness not related to RA.   We advocate less frequent LFT testing for patients on MTX when the patient is clinically stable due to lack of evidence that monitoring leads to  meaningful change in provider prescribing practice. 

                                                 

               

 


Disclosure: C. C. Lau, None; S. M. Sayeed, None; A. Kennedy, None; J. Skelly, None; S. Cooper, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lau CC, Sayeed SM, Kennedy A, Skelly J, Cooper S. Are We over-Testing for Liver Enzyme Abnormalities in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Prescribed Methotrexate? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-we-over-testing-for-liver-enzyme-abnormalities-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-prescribed-methotrexate/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-we-over-testing-for-liver-enzyme-abnormalities-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-prescribed-methotrexate/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology