ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 436

Are Providers Recommending Appropriate Screening for Hydroxychloroquine-Induced Retinal Toxicity to Their Patients?

Sarah Haserodt1, Chris Tonner2, Gabriela Schmajuk3 and Jinoos Yazdany4, 1Internal Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, 2Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 4Medicine/Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Eye disease, Hydroxychloroquine, quality and quality improvement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although well tolerated by most patients, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) can cause irreversible retinal damage. The American Association of Ophthalmology (AAO) 2016 Guidelines recommend a baseline eye exam and then annual exam after 5 years of HCQ use in patients without risk factors for retinopathy. In this study, we evaluated whether patients who are receiving HCQ were counseled to receive screening for HCQ-induced retinal toxicity and whether screening procedures were congruent with AAO Guidelines.

Methods: We analyzed system-wide electronic health records (EHR) from a large, academic health center to identify 704 patients with a face-to-face encounter in which HCQ was prescribed between 1/1/2014- 3/14/2016. A random sample of 200 patients was chosen for further analysis. 19 patients were excluded because they were not taking HCQ or did not have >1 visit with a rheumatology or dermatology clinician based on chart review. Baseline characteristics of the patients were identified through queries of structured EHR fields. Physician chart review was used to determine if counseling on the need for retinopathy screening was documented and if patients had seen an ophthalmologist.  Chi-square tests were used to determine if there was a significant difference in recommended retinopathy screening intervals based on clinical department. Among the subset of patients seen by an ophthalmologist within our system, we determined whether tests were performed according to AAO guidelines.

Results: Of the 181 patients included in the study, 82% were female, the mean age was 40±18.7 years, 43% were Caucasian, 23% were Asian, 17% Hispanic, 5% African American, and 12% other/multiple.  The mean Charlson score was 2.1±2.6 and the majority (63%) had private insurance.  152 (84%) of the patients were counseled to undergo screening for HCQ-mediated retinopathy. Table 1 lists the screening intervals recommended by clinicians, which varied significantly by department. Interestingly, of the 69 incident HCQ users, only 2 were counseled to delay annual ophthalmologic exams until 5 years of HCQ use, the recommended interval for new, low-risk users per the AAO guidelines. 115 (64%) patients saw an ophthalmologist for retinopathy screening within the study period. Of the 48 patients who were seen by ophthalmologists in our system, 25 (51%) received the more sensitive screening tests now recommended in the AAO Guidelines.

Conclusion: In our study, a majority of patients were counseled by clinicians to receive screening for HCQ-mediated retinopathy. However, very few clinicians recommended the screening interval established by the AAO 2016 Guidelines for incident users, with most suggesting yearly screening regardless of duration of use. Additionally, many patients did not receive appropriate screening for HCQ-mediated retinopathy, despite the fact that it was recommended, highlighting an area for future quality improvement efforts.

 


Disclosure: S. Haserodt, None; C. Tonner, None; G. Schmajuk, None; J. Yazdany, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Haserodt S, Tonner C, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Are Providers Recommending Appropriate Screening for Hydroxychloroquine-Induced Retinal Toxicity to Their Patients? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-providers-recommending-appropriate-screening-for-hydroxychloroquine-induced-retinal-toxicity-to-their-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-providers-recommending-appropriate-screening-for-hydroxychloroquine-induced-retinal-toxicity-to-their-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology