ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2050

Are Patients Meeting the Updated Physical Activity Guidelines? Physical Activity Participation, Recommendation, and Preferences Among Adults with Rheumatic Diseases

Victoria L. Manning1, Michael V. Hurley2, David L. Scott3 and Lindsay M. Bearne4, 1Academic Department of Physiotherapy, Health and Social Care Research Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2School of Rehabilitation Sciences, St George's University of London and Kingston University, London, United Kingdom, 3King's College London, Department of Rheumatology, London, United Kingdom, 4Academic Department of Physiotherapy, Health and Social Care Research Division,, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Exercise and physical activity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Innovations in Practice Management and Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Physical activity (PA) reduces disability, comorbidity, and risk of premature mortality in people with rheumatic diseases, and clinical guidelines recommend that PA should be integral to rheumatic disease management (NICE 2008, 2009). Updated PA guidelines (published: US 2008, UK 2011) recommend that adults complete ≥150 minutes of moderate intensity PA or ≥75 minutes of vigorous intensity PA (or equivalent) in bouts of ≥10 minutes/week. Currently, the PA levels of adults with rheumatic diseases, assessed against these guidelines, are unknown. This study evaluates the PA levels of adults with rheumatic diseases against the updated guidelines. It assesses respondents’ PA preferences and the proportion who report ever receiving PA advice from a healthcare professional (HCP).

Methods:

508 rheumatology outpatients (24% male, 76% female; 53% rheumatoid arthritis, 13% osteoarthritis, 7% psoriatic arthritis, 6% systemic lupus erythematosis, 5% fibromyalgia, 18% other; disease duration: 27% ≤1 year, 30% >1 to ≤5 years, 15% >5 to ≤10 years, 28% >10 years) were recruited from an inner city UK hospital (July-October 2010). Participants completed the short International PA Questionnaire, and 3 questions: “Has a doctor or other HCP ever suggested PA or exercise to help your arthritis or joint symptoms?” (Answers: yes, no, don’t know), “Would you like help from your doctor or health service to become more physically active?” (Answers: yes, no, don’t know), and “Which PAs do you enjoy?” (Answers: multiple options including free text response). Descriptive statistics were completed on all data, energy expenditure calculated (metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes/week = METs x weekly minutes x weekly days; walking = 3.3 METs, moderate = 4 METs, vigorous = 8 METs), and associations evaluated with Pearson’s chi-square test. Respondents were categorized as: 1) Meeting guidelines (≥500 metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes/week; equivalent to ≥150 minutes of moderate intensity PA/week or ≥75 minutes of vigorous intensity PA/week), 2) Low (<500 MET minutes/week), or 3) Inactive (no PA ≥10 minutes (per activity bout)/week).

Results:

61% of respondents met the updated PA guidelines, and 39% did not meet the guidelines (12% low, 27% inactive). Physical inactivity increased with age (P<0.01). 43% of respondents reported that they had discussed PA with a HCP, and 50% that they would “like help” to become more physically active. Those diagnosed within the last year and those categorized as ‘low’ PA were least likely to report ever receiving PA advice (both P<0.05). Walking was the most preferred PA (65%), and accounted for 70% of respondents’ total weekly energy expenditure.

Conclusion:

Two thirds of urban UK adults with rheumatic diseases meet the updated public health guidelines for PA. However, despite the potential health benefits related to even low levels of PA, many are entirely inactive. PA advice may not be routinely included in the management of rheumatic diseases, despite patients reporting that they would like help to become more physically active. HCPs need to increase awareness of PA guidelines, and actively encourage regular PA. Walking may provide an easy and accessible form of exercise for people with rheumatic diseases.


Disclosure:

V. L. Manning,
None;

M. V. Hurley,
None;

D. L. Scott,
None;

L. M. Bearne,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/are-patients-meeting-the-updated-physical-activity-guidelines-physical-activity-participation-recommendation-and-preferences-among-adults-with-rheumatic-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology