ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L13

Apremilast, an Oral Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Philip J. Mease2, Juan J. Gomez-Reino3, Adebajo Adewale4, Jürgen Wollenhaupt5, ChiaChi Hu6 and Randall Stevens6, 1UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 2Rheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 3Rheumatology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Santiago, Spain, 4University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 5Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany, 6Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: clinical trials, drug therapy, Psoriatic arthritis, randomized trials and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Oral Session

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstracts

Background/Purpose: Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, works intracellularly to modulate a network of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, including those implicated in the etiopathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This phase 3 study (PALACE 1) compared the efficacy and safety of apremilast with placebo (PBO) in subjects with active PsA despite previous DMARDs and biologics.

Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to PBO, apremilast 20 mg BID, or apremilast 30 mg BID stratified by baseline DMARD use. At wk 16, subjects with <20% reduction from baseline in swollen and tender joint counts were re-randomized to apremilast 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID (PBO group), or remained on their initial dose (apremilast groups). All subjects then continued assigned treatment through wk 24. Stable concurrent treatment with MTX, sulfasalazine, leflunomide or a combination was allowed.

Results: 504 subjects were randomized and comparable across treatment groups for demographics, disease characteristics, and prior/concurrent therapy. Of note, 23.6% of patients had prior biologic exposure, including 9.3% considered biologic failures. At baseline, 64.9% were taking DMARDs (54.2%, MTX). At wk 16, a significantly greater proportion of subjects treated with apremilast 20 mg BID (31.3%; P=0.0140) and 30 mg BID (41.0%; P<0.0001) achieved an ACR20 vs PBO (19.4%) (Table). In subjects receiving apremilast 30 mg BID, higher ACR20 responses were seen in subjects receiving apremilast monotherapy and in biologic-naïve subjects compared with the overall population response. At wk 24, apremilast was associated with significant differences vs PBO in ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, HAQ-DI, SF-36 Physical Function scores, DAS-28, and EULAR response. In general, response rates were higher with apremilast 30 mg BID. Apremilast was generally well tolerated. Adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥5% of any treatment group were diarrhea (PBO, 2.4%; apremilast 20 mg BID, 11.3%; and apremilast 30 mg BID, 19.0%), nausea (6.5%, 9.5%, and 18.5%), headache (4.8%, 10.1%, and 10.7%), and upper respiratory tract infection (3.6%, 6.0%, and 4.2%). The majority (>95%) of AEs were mild or moderate; discontinuations due to AEs were similar across all treatment arms (5-7%). Serious AEs occurred in 7 (PBO), 8 (apremilast 20 mg BID), and 9 (apremilast 30 mg BID) subjects. No opportunistic infections (including TB) or lymphoma were observed, and there was not a greater risk of cardiovascular events.

Conclusion: Apremilast significantly improved signs and symptoms of PsA and resulted in statistically and clinically meaningful improvements in physical function. Apremilast was generally well tolerated and no new safety or laboratory signals were detected.

Table. Primary and select secondary end points

 

PBO (n=165)

Apremilast
20 mg BID (n=163)

Apremilast
30 mg BID (n=161)

ACR20 at wk 16, %

19.4

31.3*

 

41.0†

 

APR alone (n=172)

10.5

31.5*

 

50.8†

 

APR+DMARDs (n=317)

24.1

31.2‡

 

35.0‡

 

ACR20 at wk 16

Biologic-naïve subjects (n=363)

23.7

31.2‡

43.3*

APR alone (n=89)

11.5

24.1‡

 

58.8*

 

APR+DMARDs (n=274)

27.2

33.3‡

 

37.2‡

 

Select secondary end points at wk 24

 

 

 

ACR50, %

4.2

15.3*

 

19.9†

 

ACR70, %

0.6

5.5*

 

11.2†

 

HAQ-DI, LS mean change from baseline (SE)

-0.077 (0.037)

-0.212 (0.037)*

 

-0.260 (0.037)*

 

DAS-28, LS mean improvement from baseline (SE)

0.20 (0.087)

0.66 (0.087)*

 

0.91 (0.087) †

 

Good or moderate EULAR response achievement, %

29.1

45.4*

 

51.6†

 

SF-36 Physical Function, LS mean change from baseline (SE)

1.46 (0.671)

3.50 (0.675)*

 

5.06 (0.674)†

 

Efficacy analyses were conducted using the per-protocol population (N=489); last observation carried forward was used for missing data.

*P<0.05; †P≤0.0001;‡P=non-significant vs. PBO.


Disclosure:

A. Kavanaugh,

Celgene,

2,

Celgene,

5;

P. J. Mease,

Abbott Laboratories,

2,

Amgen,

2,

BiogenIdec,

2,

BMS,

2,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

UCB,

2,

Celgene,

2,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

2,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Abbott Laboratories,

5,

Amgen,

5,

BiogenIdec,

5,

BMS,

5,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

5,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

5,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

UCB,

5,

Celgene,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Abbott Laboratories,

8,

Amgen,

8,

BiogenIdec,

8,

BMS,

8,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

8,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

8,

Eli Lilly and Company,

8,

Pfizer Inc,

8,

UCB,

8;

J. J. Gomez-Reino,

BMS,

8,

Pfizer Inc,

8,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

8,

Schering-Plough,

8,

UCB,

8,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Schering-Plough,

2;

A. Adewale,
None;

J. Wollenhaupt,

Abbott Laboratories,

5,

BMS,

5,

MSD,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

UCB,

5;

C. Hu,

Celgene,

1,

Celgene,

3;

R. Stevens,

Celgene,

1,

Celgene,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/apremilast-an-oral-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitor-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-of-a-phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology