ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1289

Antigen Bead Array versus ELISA to Detect anti-cN1A Antibodies in Patients with Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis and Correlation with Clinical, Serological and Histological Features

Antonella Notarnicola1, Francesco Bonomi 2, Cecilia Hellstrom 3, Elisa Pin 3, Helena Idborg 1, Peter Nilsson 4 and Ingrid E Lundberg 1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy, 3Affinity Proteomics, SciLifeLab, Department of Protein Science, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Science for Life Laboratory, Affinity Proteomics; KTH − Royal Institute of Technology, School of Biotechnology;Stockholm (Sweden), Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-cN1A antibodies, Antigen Bead Array and Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbant Assays (ELISA), Inclusion body myositis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Muscle Biology, Myositis & Myopathies Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Antibodies to cytosolic 5’-Nucleotidase 1A (anti-cN1A or NT5C1A) are considered the only currently known serum biomarker for sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis (sIBM). They are reported in 33-76% of sIBM patients but little is known on their possible correlation with clinical, serological and histological features. Few studies have shown that anti-cN1A positive patients with sIBM present with a more severe phenotype and increased mortality risk.

Aims: To analyze the prevalence of anti-cN1A autoantibodies in a Swedish cohort of patients with sIBM by applying suspension antigen bead array and a commercially available ELISA assay. To explore whether the anti-cN1A autoantibodies could identify a distinct subgroup of sIBM with specific clinical or laboratory characteristics.

Methods: Reactivity to one N-terminal and one C-terminal protein fragment of the NT5C1A antigen was investigated by using a suspension bead array platform in serum samples from 46 patients with sIBM, 30 with Polymyositis (PM) and 30 with Dermatomyositis (DM), HLA matched. The ELISA kit was then used for 31/46 sIBM samples as well as in 33 DM and 43 PM samples. Plasma samples from 17 patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 9 SLE-controls were also screened by ELISA. Clinical, serological and histological data of the sIBM cohort were collected at time of diagnosis and accumulated data during the disease course. The 46 sIBM patients were defined as having anti-cN1A antibodies if they tested positive by at least one of the two assays.

Results: The antigen bead array showed a sensitivity of 34.8% of identifying sIBM and a specificity of 83.3% when performed with the N-terminal fragment. The sensitivity decreased to 6,5% and the specificity increased to 93,5% when the test was run with the C-terminal fragment. The sensitivity and specificity for the ELISA assay were 41,9% and 74,5%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between the ELISA and the antigen bead array results (N-terminal fragment) (Spearman’s rho 0.74, p value < 0.001). In the sIBM cohort, 19 seropositive and 27 seronegative to anti-cN1A antibodies were identified. No statistically significant differences in any of the analyzed variables were found between the 2 groups, but some interesting trends were observed. At time of diagnosis, seropositive patients had more frequently finger flexor weakness and reported higher score on patient visual analogue scale (VAS) for disease activity than the seronegative group. At first biopsy, increased amount of connective and/or fat tissue was found more commonly in anti-cN1A positive patients. More anti-cN1A positive than negative patients had positive history of falls and did not reach stabilization nor remission after the first year from diagnosis, independently of the use of immunosuppressive treatment.

Conclusion: Positivity to anti-cN1A antibodies is highly specific for sIBM diagnosis, as previously reported. The results from the antigen bead array suggest that the main epitope may be localized at the N-terminal region of the NT5C1A protein. In our cohort, anti-cN1A antibodies were not associated to any specific features but the seropositive group seemed to present with a more aggressive disease course.


Disclosure: A. Notarnicola, None; F. Bonomi, None; C. Hellstrom, None; E. Pin, None; H. Idborg, None; P. Nilsson, None; I. Lundberg, Astra Zeneca, 2, Corbus, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Roche, 4, Novartis, 4.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Notarnicola A, Bonomi F, Hellstrom C, Pin E, Idborg H, Nilsson P, Lundberg I. Antigen Bead Array versus ELISA to Detect anti-cN1A Antibodies in Patients with Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis and Correlation with Clinical, Serological and Histological Features [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antigen-bead-array-versus-elisa-to-detect-anti-cn1a-antibodies-in-patients-with-sporadic-inclusion-body-myositis-and-correlation-with-clinical-serological-and-histological-features/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/antigen-bead-array-versus-elisa-to-detect-anti-cn1a-antibodies-in-patients-with-sporadic-inclusion-body-myositis-and-correlation-with-clinical-serological-and-histological-features/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology