ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1835

Anti-Osteoporosis Medication Use after Hip or Vertebral Fracture

Robert A. Overman1 and Chad L. Deal2, 1Eshelman School of Pharmacy - Division of Pharmaceutical Policy and Outcomes, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Dept of Rheum & Imm Dis /A 50, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: fractures, osteoporosis, treatment and treatment guidlelines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Current National Osteoporosis Guidelines recommend treatment with an approved osteoporosis medication after hip and vertebral fracture. Only 20% of patients receive osteoporosis therapy after hip fracture. We examined the rates of treatment within 365 days of an osteoporosis medication after hip and vertebrae fracture in a large health care system.

Methods: We evaluated use of anti-osteoporosis medications after fracture by identifying all patients over age 40 who had a hip fracture that was surgically repaired and all vertebral fracture patients undergoing augmentation (kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty) based on administrative billing Common Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes between 2010 and September 2013. These patients were then linked to their electronic medical record (EMR) data. We define the index date as the date of the surgical procedure with patients followed until death, AOM use, or 365 days. AOMs in this analysis are bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide, estrogen, or raloxifene. Dates of medication use are based on start and stop dates in the EMR. Basic demographic variables including age, race, gender, prior AOM use, and site of fracture, were collected from the patients EMR and are presented as mean (standard deviation [SD]) or n (%).We evaluated initiation or continuation of AOM at 90, 180, and 365 days post-index and factors associated with their initiation. Hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) were created with cox proportional hazards model and are adjusted for gender, race, age by decade, and site of fracture.

Results: There were 1,352 hip fractures and 296 vertebral fractures undergoing augmentation between January 2010 and December 2012. Mean age was 80.9 (SD 12.7) for hip and 75.0 (SD 12.5) for vertebral fractures. Women were the majority population for both hip (73.1%) and vertebral fractures (72.6%). Caucasians made up the majority of both populations (hip 89.6%; vertebral 92.2%). First event was AOM use for 16.1% (hip: 11.1%, vertebral: 39.2%) and death for 11.3% (hip: 12.5%, vertebral 5.7%) of the population. Prior to index date 24.2% of hip and 40.5% of vertebral fracture patients were prescribed an AOM. AOMs were used at fracture or within 90 days for 12.0%, 13.2%, and 14.6% for hip fracture and 34.5%, 37.8% and 45.3% for vertebral fractures at 90,180 and 365 days respectively. Vertebral fractures were associated with an increased likelihood of AOM treatment by 365 days (HR 3.1; 95% CI 2.4, 4.0), women (79.2% of population) were no more likely to be treated (HR 1.3 95% CI 0.9, 1.8) compared to men, and AOM use prior to fracture was associated with treatment by 365 days (HR 3.6; 95% CI 2.8, 4.7).

Conclusion: Treatment gaps continue to persist for hip fracture patients with 14.6% of patients receiving treatment by 365 days after fracture, and  while only 45.3%% of vertebral fracture patients having augmentation receiving therapy by 365 days. Patients with a vertebral fracture and those who were treated before fracture were more often placed on AOM. Treatment after fracture helps has been demonstrated to reduce the likelihood of additional fractures and interventions are needed to increase treatment rates in these at risk populations.


Disclosure:

R. A. Overman,
None;

C. L. Deal,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/anti-osteoporosis-medication-use-after-hip-or-vertebral-fracture/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology