ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2025

Ancestry Influences the Gene Expression Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Contributes to Transcriptomic Heterogeneity in Lupus Patients

Michelle Catalina1, Prathyusha Bachali 2, Anthony Yeo 3, Nicholas Geraci 2, Michelle Petri 4, Amrie Grammer 2 and Peter Lipsky 2, 1AMPEL BioSolutions, LLC, harvard, MA, 2AMPEL BioSolutions, LLC, Charlottesville, VA, 3Rilite Foundation, Charlottesville, VA, 4Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: bioinformatics and autoimmunity, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: SLE – Etiology & Pathogenesis Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with both sex and ancestral bias. Gene expression analysis has revealed complex heterogeneity between SLE patients, making deconvolution of the data difficult and delineation of the impact of different disease drivers uncertain. We, therefore, sought to understand the individual contributions of ancestry, gender and medications to gene expression heterogeneity, as well as to determine the association of gene expression profiles with various SLE manifestations.

Methods: Bulk Differential Expression (DE) analysis and Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) were carried out on 1903 SLE patients of African (AA), European (EA) and Native American (NAA) ancestry. Modules of genes defined by co-expression in patients and representing either functional or cell specific groups were used to determine the relationship between drugs, SLE manifestations and individual patient gene expression. Logistic regression analysis was used to understand the relative contribution of ancestry, drugs and SLE manifestations to gene expression signatures.

Results: Gene expression analysis between female disease-matched SLE patients of AA, EA, and NAA revealed thousands of DE transcripts between ancestries, but none within a single ancestry. AA, EA and NAA SLE patients had significantly different cellular contributions to gene expression and these differences were related to significantly different percentages of patients in each ancestry with specific signatures. GSVA showed an increase in plasma cells, B cells and T cells in the majority of AA patients and an increase in myeloid cells in most EA and NAA patients. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressives significantly changed gene expression and contributed to the disparate signatures between and within ancestries. Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies and low complement, but not other clinical features of SLE, were significantly associated with gene expression in AA, EA and NAA SLE patients. Despite the impact of medications, ancestry made a significant contribution to gene expression profiles. Notably, we found that differences between AA and EA SLE patients are similar to those between healthy people of these ancestries, and that there were fewer differences between males and females of the same ancestry, than between ancestries.

Conclusion: Combinations of different ancestries, specific medications and autoantibody production associate with gene expression profiles (Figure 1). Importantly, ancestry contributes unique features of gene expression, implying differences in the molecular basis of SLE in these populations. Understanding the contributions of the gene expression signature components may permit a better interpretation of the signatures and their relationship to disease status.


Catalina Lupus Ancestry Figure 1 ACR

Figure 1. Gene Expression is Affected by Ancestry, SLE Autoantibodies and SOC Drugs. Average difference in GSVA enrichment scores are shown for Healthy. Average GSVA enrichment scores are shown for Lupus patients.


Disclosure: M. Catalina, None; P. Bachali, None; A. Yeo, None; N. Geraci, None; M. Petri, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Exagen, 2, 5; A. Grammer, None; P. Lipsky, Horizon, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Catalina M, Bachali P, Yeo A, Geraci N, Petri M, Grammer A, Lipsky P. Ancestry Influences the Gene Expression Profile in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Contributes to Transcriptomic Heterogeneity in Lupus Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ancestry-influences-the-gene-expression-profile-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-contributes-to-transcriptomic-heterogeneity-in-lupus-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/ancestry-influences-the-gene-expression-profile-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-contributes-to-transcriptomic-heterogeneity-in-lupus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology